 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Bonhotel v. Bonhotel, FA910055322,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF LITCHFIELD, AT LITCHFIELD, February 7, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In an action dissolving a husband and wife's marriage, the trial court denied the wife's 21 motions, including her motion for attorney's fees, denied the husband's motion for attorney's fees, but granted the husband's motion for sanctions.
|
|||||
| Chase Manhattan Mortg. Corp. v. Burton, CV020818303,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, February 7, 2003, Decided , February 7, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Motion to open and vacate foreclosure judgment was denied where there was no lack of due process or fairness in rendering of judgment since evidence led to conclusion that mortgagor received notice of judgment hearing and of entry of judgment.
|
|||||
| Grolier Inc. v. City of Danbury, CV000339395S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF DANBURY, AT DANBURY, February 7, 2003, Decided , February 7, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where the parties' appraisers used different credible percentages for depreciation, the true and actual value of the taxpayer's property was somewhere in between; therefore, the court determined the valuation to be used.
|
|||||
| Johnson v. Bennett, CV010084817S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF LITCHFIELD, AT LITCHFIELD, February 7, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court entered judgment in favor of adjacent property owners on property owner's claims for trespass because property owner did not prove location of disputed property line, but also entered judgment for property owner on counterclaims.
|
|||||
| Nage Local Ri-200 v. City of Bridgeport, 0385148,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, February 7, 2003, Decided , February 7, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In considering a union grievance, an arbitration panel erred in holding that it would not schedule a case on the merits due to the specific contractual limitations, because that issue was not part of the arbitration submission.
|
|||||
| O'Brien v. Ski Sundown, CV000083444S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF LITCHFIELD, AT LITCHFIELD, February 7, 2003, Decided , February 7, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The factual question of whether the ski lift was safe was not a matter within the ken of the ordinary juror. Expert testimony was also required to establish whether the ski lift operator had been negligent. Thus, there was no basis for liability.
|
|||||
| Quinones v. Warden, CV990002967,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TOLLAND, GEOGRAPHICAL AREA 19 AT ROCKVILLE, February 7, 2003, Decided , February 7, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defense counsel obtained a relatively good outcome for a client charged with probation violation and several new offenses, so the client could not afterward challenge his guilty plea as based on ineffective assistance.
|
|||||
| Swanson v. Sega Ready Mix, CV020345854S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF DANBURY, AT DANBURY, February 7, 2003, Decided , February 7, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where a supplier answered the complaint, it was precluded from submitting a motion to strike; in any event, a products liability claim was to be in lieu of all other claims.
|
|||||
| Torres v. Butler, X07CV020079052S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TOLLAND, COMPLEX LITIGATION DOCKET, AT TOLLAND, February 7, 2003, Decided , February 7, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Inmate's allegations that prison employee and his coworker engaged in misconduct aimed at provoking assaults on inmate and causing him emotional distress described reckless or malicious conduct sufficient to vitiate their personal statutory immunity.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
