 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Callahan v. Hennessy, CV000093104,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX, AT MIDDLETOWN, February 6, 2002, Decided , February 6, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Father did not show extreme and outrageous conduct or that he was present when it occurred. Although father alleged bystander emotional distress, no duty was owed, father was not present, and injury was not substantial.
|
|||||
| Capital v. Faust, CV99360461S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, February 6, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Referee's finding that lender did not comply with notice requirements of Connecticut's Retail Installment Sales Financing Act when selling repossessed car did not compel legal conclusion that lender had also violated UCC.
|
|||||
| Cyr v. General Ins. Co., CV990498221S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW BRITAIN AT NEW BRITAIN, February 6, 2002, Decided , February 6, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The jury's decision not to award non-economic damages was entirely plausible and consistent with the evidence presented, which included that it was a low impact collision and that the victims' testimony and medical reports were inconsistent.
|
|||||
| FDIC v. Caldrello, 89511581,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NEW LONDON, February 6, 2002, Decided , February 6, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court's order granted bank receiver's application for prejudgment remedies and outlined remedies after its foreclosure judgment against debtors had been upheld on appeal. There was probable cause receiver would get favorable final judgment.
|
|||||
| Friedman v. Friedman, FA010450825S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, February 6, 2002, Decided , February 6, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The marriage was dissolved with no fault assigned for the breakdown. The husband was awarded more of the marital assets because the wife earned a higher income. No alimony was awarded.
|
|||||
| Gianetti v. Gerardi, CV010384501,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, February 6, 2002, Decided , February 6, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Motion to strike was granted, where doctor failed to adequately plead claims for relief for unjust enrichment and in quantum meruit. Doctor failed to allege lack of remedy under contract or adequately allege existence of implied contract.
|
|||||
| Graham v. Graham, FA9265185,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX, AT MIDDLETOWN, February 6, 2002, Decided , February 6, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court did not have jurisdiction under Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act to change primary physical residence where one child was over 18 and Virgin Islands, not Connecticut was the "home state" for mother's minor child.
|
|||||
| In re Alasia G., [NO NUMBER IN ORIGINAL],
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX, CHILD PROTECTION SESSION AT MIDDLETOWN, February 6, 2002, Decided , February 6, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Best interests of child who was thriving in foster care were served by terminating parental rights of parents who failed to deal with problems that led to child's placement and did not maintain parent-child relationship.
|
|||||
| In re Anastasia C., [NO NUMBER IN ORIGINAL],
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX, JUVENILE MATTERS AT MIDDLETOWN, February 6, 2002, Decided , February 6, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Maternal grandmother's psychological evaluation and other documents could be released provided that all proper names except maternal grandmother's and section of report dealing with parent/child interaction were redacted.
|
|||||
| Krodel v. Krodel, FA010122460S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NORWICH, February 6, 2002, Decided , February 6, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court dissolved 22-year marriage on grounds of irretrievable breakdown, awarded parties joint legal custody of their children, declined to award alimony, and made various other orders regarding property and debt division and support.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
