LexisNexis
  

Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.


   State Courts - Connecticut - February 9, 2006

  
Battalino v. Van Patten, 4000087, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NEW LONDON, February 9, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Lessee's action for specific performance of an option to purchase property was timely under Conn. Gen. Stat. § 47-33a as it was filed within one-year of the option becoming executory. Lessor was directed to convey the property and was allowed to retain sums paid by the lessee for rent that exceeded an agreed upon purchase price.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Carberry-Flynn v. Giumarra, CV040092512S, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF LITCHFIELD, AT LITCHFIELD, February 9, 2006, Decided , February 9, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Doyle v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals, CV040286962S, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT MERIDEN, February 9, 2006, Decided , February 9, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Esposito v. CPM Ins. Servs., File Nos. CV 04-4010919S, CV04-4010920S, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, February 9, 2006, Decided , February 9, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: An insured's assignment to executors of its right to bring a negligence action against its insurance agents, in return for a promise by the executors not to execute a judgment against the insured in a wrongful death action, was lawful; the agents were not entitled to summary judgment in the executors' negligence actions.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Fleet Nat'l Bank v. Indep. Energy Servs., Inc., CV054006656, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, February 9, 2006, Decided , February 9, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Where the guarantors argued that the lender rejected the 1995 loan application under which they agreed to be guarantors, summary judgment under Conn. Gen. Prac. Book, R. Super. Ct. § 17-49 was denied. An issue of material fact existed as to whether the 1995 application was ever approved and whether the obligations of the guarantors ever arose.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Hiltz v. Hiltz, FA950339853, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, February 9, 2006, Decided , February 9, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Valuation of the parties' marital home was entered, with the husband paying his share of the repairs and debts thereon from his share of the sale proceeds. The wife was thus given 90 days to exercise her option to buy the husband's interest. Finally, for the purpose of net equities, no conveyance taxes or other fees were to be deducted.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Jaramillo v. Case, CV044001262, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF LITCHFIELD, AT LITCHFIELD, February 9, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Where a property buyer failed to show that he was ready, willing, and able to purchase the sellers' property on the mortgage contingency date or within a reasonable time thereafter because he failed to obtain the necessary commitment in accordance with the terms of the purchase agreement, he was not entitled to specific performance.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Knize v. Knize, FSTFA020190291S, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD-NORWALK AT STAMFORD, February 9, 2006, Decided , February 9, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Langer v. Mail Delivery & Courier Servs., CV054008535S, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, February 9, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Since the former employers' conduct of calling a former employee names in front of his daughter was not so outrageous in character as to go beyond all possible bounds of decency, and to be regarded as atrocious, and utterly intolerable in a civilized community, the court struck the intentional infliction of emotional distress claim.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Nat'l Spiritual Assembly v. City of Stamford, FSTCV000179519, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD-NORWALK AT STAMFORD, February 9, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Back to Top
  

  www.lexisnexis.com |  About LexisNexis |  Terms & Conditions |  Customer Support |  Sitemap |  Contact Us
  CopyrightŠ 2008  LexisNexis®  All rights reserved.