 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Brown v. Warden, TSRCV054000600S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TOLLAND, AT ROCKVILLE, February 8, 2007, Decided , February 8, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Inmate's petition for a writ of habeas corpus, which alleged that a board of pardons and parole was incorrectly interpreting and applying Conn. Gen. Stat. § 54-125a to establish the inmate's parole eligibility date, was dismissed; parole eligibility under § 54-125a did not constitute a liberty interest sufficient to invoke habeas jurisdiction.
|
|||||
| Echols v. Elrac, CV0605001408S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT MERIDEN, February 8, 2007, Decided , February 8, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The allegations in plaintiff's complaint against a motor vehicle lessor were stricken because the writ was served on the lessor on October 24, 2006, which was after the date of the enactment of 49 U.S.C.S. § 30106, and, thus, § 30106 applied, barring any claim against the lessor based on vicarious liability.
|
|||||
| Gelling v. Gelling, FSTFA054005916S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD-NORWALK AT STAMFORD, February 8, 2007, Decided , February 8, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Husband's 13-year marriage to his wife was dissolved. The husband was directed to pay child support and alimony, and a division of property and debts was made.
|
|||||
| Ginsberg v. Lathrop, CV054002568,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NEW LONDON, February 8, 2007, Decided , February 8, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Fact that lessee's landlord had been unpleasant and had frightened one of the lessee's employees did not constitute behavior on the part of the landlord sufficient to support a defense of constructive eviction in a breach of lease action; lessee breached the lease by vacating premises early and landlord was awarded lost rent and interest.
|
|||||
| Greer v. Hansen, FA064022679,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, February 8, 2007, Decided , February 8, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| In re Jordan S., M08CP04009601A,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX, CHILD PROTECTION SESSION AT MIDDLETOWN, February 8, 2007, Decided , February 8, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: With respect to the best interests of the child contemplated by Conn. Gen. Stat. § 17a-112(j)(2), termination of parental rights was in the best interests of a child who had been out of his mother's care and in foster care for more than two years. The father had been whereabouts unknown since 2005 and had failed to achieve rehabilitation.
|
|||||
| Jones v. Jones, FA064004821,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX, AT MIDDLETOWN, February 8, 2007, Decided , February 8, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Husband's less than five-year marriage was dissolved based on parties' mutual fault; the husband was directed to pay his former wife alimony, the marital home was to be sold, one of the husband's 401(k) accounts was to be split 50/50 via a QDRO, and each party was made responsible for obtaining his or her own medical insurance.
|
|||||
| Krug v. Krug, FA020125165S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NORWICH, February 8, 2007, Decided , February 8, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Lebejko v. Lebejko, FA064004870S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WINDHAM, AT PUTNAM, February 8, 2007, Decided , February 8, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Florida was the "home state" of two children for UCCJEA jurisdiction purposes; the children had only lived in Connecticut five and a half months before mother's custody matter was commenced, and as father was still in Florida, under Conn. Gen. Stat. § 46b-115k(a)(2), it remained their home state until they resided in Connecticut six months.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
