LexisNexis
  
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.


   State Courts - Connecticut - September 15, 2009

  
Comm'n on Human Rights v. Litchfield Hous. Auth., AC 29269, APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, September 15, 2009, Officially Released
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Credit One, LLC v. Head, AC 30467, APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, September 15, 2009, Officially Released
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Diamond 67, LLC v. Planning & Zoning Comm'n of Vernon, AC 29743, APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, September 15, 2009, Officially Released
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Jarvis v. Lieder, AC 30457, APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, September 15, 2009, Officially Released
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Lewis v. Comm'r of Corr., AC 29276, APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, September 15, 2009, Officially Released
View this case - free  

Overview: Inmate's habeas petition was properly denied because, inter alia, the trial court's finding that the inmate had not proven his claim of ineffective assistance in relation to the inmate's waiver of a jury trial was based on a credibility determination, and, because of this, he was not able to prevail.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Milford Paintball, LLC v. Wampus Milford Assocs., LLC, AC 28926, APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, September 15, 2009, Officially Released
View this case - free  

Overview: Trial court erred in holding that parties' lease did not become effective because, although lease term began when landlord delivered possession to tenant with landlord's work substantially completed, other provisions of the lease provided that it became binding and effective on the date on which the lease was executed and delivered.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Nanni v. Dino Corp., AC 29340, APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, September 15, 2009, Officially Released
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
State v. Banks, AC 28785, APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, September 15, 2009, Officially Released
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
State v. Colon, AC 29684, APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, September 15, 2009, Officially Released
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
State v. Conn. State Emples. Ass'n, SEIU Local 2001, AC 29702, APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, September 15, 2009, Officially Released
View this case - free  

Overview: Arbitrator's determination in employment grievance exceeded his submission in violation of Conn. Gen. Stat. ¿ 52-418(a)(4) because, after arbitrator found that demotion was for just cause, his work was completed. Arbitrator's ruling that demotion could not have been extended in perpetuity and ordering employee's reinstatement was improper.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Back to Top
  

 www.lexisnexis.com  |  About LexisNexis  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Customer Support  |  Contact Us
  Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.