 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Hartman v. Cammalleri, FA 840070278S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD - NORWALK, AT STAMFORD, December 29, 1999, Decided , December 29, 1999, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where Connecticut was neither child's home state nor was it in the child's best interest for Connecticut to assume jurisdiction, the court lacked subject matter jurisdiction and motion to dismiss was granted.
|
|||||
| In re Alexis J., [NO NUMBER IN ORIGINAL],
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX, AT MIDDLETOWN, JUVENILE MATTERS, December 29, 1999, Decided , December 29, 1999, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A mother's parental rights to her child were terminated where she failed to rehabilitate herself sufficiently to assume a responsible position in her child's life.
|
|||||
| In re William B., [NO NUMBER IN ORIGINAL],
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX, AT MIDDLETOWN, JUVENILE MATTERS, December 29, 1999, Decided , December 29, 1999, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Petition to terminate parental rights was granted where the father abandoned the child and the mother refused to acknowledge the child's serious psychological problems or accept responsibility for them.
|
|||||
| Jerjies v. Jerjies, FA 820271652,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD - NEW BRITAIN, AT HARTFORD, FAMILY SUPPORT MAGISTRATE DIVISION, December 29, 1999, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Motion to reopen and set aside order modifying support was entertained and granted due to service deficiencies; because motion to dismiss was untimely, defendant waived lack of jurisdiction and improper service claims.
|
|||||
| Philips Enfield Assocs. v. Pumpernickel Pub of Enfield, HDSP 106501, H-1185,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD - NEW BRITAIN, AT HARTFORD, HOUSING SESSION, December 29, 1999, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Jurisdiction was not lacking where motion to dismiss was based on the untruthfulness or illegality of the reasons given to quit the lease, so motion to dismiss was denied.
|
|||||
| Silverbrook II Llc v. Water Polllution Control Auth. of Orange, CV 970060623S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF ANSONIA - MILFORD, AT MILFORD, December 29, 1999, Decided , December 29, 1999, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: As plaintiff had a right to depend on the land records and no caveat was contained on land records, plaintiff could assume that no sewer assessment would be forthcoming. Thus, water pollution control's assessment was void.
|
|||||
| Stevens v. Alan Barry & Assocs., CV 980333206S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF DANBURY, AT DANBURY, December 29, 1999, Decided , December 29, 1999, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant law firm's motion to strike cross claim was granted, since defendant individual was unable to meet the test for common law indemnification because the underlying claims involved intentional torts.
|
|||||
| Todd v. Zale, Inc., CV980063919S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF ANSONIA - MILFORD, AT DERBY, December 29, 1999, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Judgment for defendants on plaintiff's action alleging negligence and assault as a result of an incident that occurred on premises owned by defendant corporation because plaintiff himself precipitated the incident.
|
|||||
| Tokai Fin. Servs. v. Myers, CV 970081267S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX, AT MIDDLETOWN, December 29, 1999, Decided , December 29, 1999, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Failure of lessor to timely credit payments received from lessee amounted to breach of agreement and duty of good faith and fair dealing, but not violation of unfair practices act.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
