 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Kubish v. Zega, (AC 19697),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, February 6, 2001, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In partition action, Connecticut trial court was bound by committee's fact findings, but could modify recommendations to better apply law to facts; money award was proper method to equalize minor inequities.
|
|||||
| Lynch v. Lynch, FA940137584S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD - NORWALK AT STAMFORD, February 6, 2001, Decided , February 6, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Mother was denied increase in child support payments because existing obligation was almost double presumptive minimum, there were no unmet child needs not being covered by payments, and there was no substantial change in circumstances.
|
|||||
| Melendez v. Home Depot, (AC 19864),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, February 6, 2001, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Workers' compensation award for plaintiff was proper where it would have been unreasonable to require her to travel across the country to receive medical care available where she had moved.
|
|||||
| Metro. Life Ins. Co. v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co., (SC 16205), (SC 16206), (SC 16207),
SUPREME COURT OF CONNECTICUT, February 6, 2001, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A trial court's determination of the meaning of occurrence in several insurers' excess policies was affirmed where underlying claims of exposure to asbestos constituted several occurrences under the policies.
|
|||||
| Newcourt Communs. Fin. Corp. v. Best, 554607,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NEW LONDON, February 6, 2001, Decided , February 6, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's mere assertion of a fact was insufficient to refute an affidavit which was properly submitted to the court in support of the plaintiff's summary judgment motion.
|
|||||
| Ottiano v. Shetucket Plumbing Supply Co., (AC 19845),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, February 6, 2001, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Denial of defendants' motion to open the judgment seeking to deduct economic damages was proper where the trial court made it clear that it did not intend an award of economic damages.
|
|||||
| State v. Bryant, (AC 19568),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, February 6, 2001, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Admission of out-of-court statement by witness who recanted was proper as prior inconsistent statement in absence of constitutional objections; other defendant's uncorroborated statement was inherently unreliable.
|
|||||
| State v. Davis, (AC 18619),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, February 6, 2001, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Despite police officer's suggestive language to victim at time of show-up of defendant, surrounding circumstances established reliability of eyewitness identification, so motion to suppress was properly denied.
|
|||||
| State v. Valinski, (AC 17466),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, February 6, 2001, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Advertising agent was convicted of driving with suspended license because although he had work permit, he was returning from fishing when he was stopped for drunk driving and could not prove that he had been fishing with business associate.
|
|||||
| Waugh v. Waugh, FA00071945S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF ANSONIA - MILFORD, AT MILFORD, February 6, 2001, Decided , February 6, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The court dissolved the marriage between plaintiff father and defendant mother, awarded joint legal and physical custody and joint child support, divided all assets and debts, and took other pertinent action.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
