 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Republic Credit Corp. v. Caldrello, 556964,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NEW LONDON, February 6, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Inclusion of additional tract of land in notice to quit did not cause owners to be misled. Claim of defective tax sale was complex and more appropriate for resolution at trial.
|
|||||
| Schumacher v. Schumacher, FA920308516S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF DANBURY, AT DANBURY, February 6, 2002, Decided , February 6, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because father had current income, court determined his child support obligations and ordered him to pay proportionate share of support and unreimbursed or uninsured necessary medical and dental expenses.
|
|||||
| Smith-Groh, Inc. v. Planning & Zoning Comm'n of Greenwich, CV010506781S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW BRITAIN AT NEW BRITAIN, February 6, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Zoning commission did not establish that denial of zoning amendment was necessary to protect substantial public interests in health, safety, or other legitimate objectives, or that a public interest outweighed the need for affordable housing.
|
|||||
| State v. Cabral, CR980074608,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, GEOGRAPHICAL AREA 21 AT NORWICH, February 6, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because defendant admitted that he tried to exercise his constitutional rights under Miranda, the warning had been given, and its accuracy and completeness were not an issue at the suppression hearing.
|
|||||
| State v. Grant, CR6481390,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, February 6, 2002, Decided , February 6, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Statements defendant made during arrest, while being transported to police station, and while being booked were spontaneous and admissible, but court suppressed defendant's answers to questions police asked to clarify defendant's statements.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
