|
|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases —
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case —
for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
|
| |
State Courts -
Connecticut - February 8, 2005
|
| |
Hanley v. Hanley, FA030196535S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD-NORWALK AT STAMFORD, February 8, 2005, Decided , February 8, 2005, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: A wife in a dissolution action was awarded the marital home where she showed that her parents had gifted $ 300,000 toward the $ 467,500 purchase price and that additional monies toward repairs and improvements for the house were also gifted by her parents during the course of the marriage.
|
|
| |
In re Michelle C., CP02006995A, CP02006996A,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX, CHILD PROTECTION SESSION AT MIDDLETOWN, February 8, 2005, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Father's parental rights were terminated under Conn. Gen. Stat. ? 17a-112; reasonable attempts had been made at reunifying him with his children, he had not reached any level of rehabilitation by the time of adjudication, rehabilitation was not possible within a reasonable time, and termination was in the best interests of his children.
|
|
| |
Kelley v. Aetna, Inc., CV040833157,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, February 8, 2005, Decided , February 8, 2005, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Corporation's motion for summary judgment, alleging that company, not corporation, was in control of site where a slip and fall occurred, was denied where issue of fact existed as to whether corporation or company was in control of site. Papers filed by corporation raised an issue of fact as to whether corporation, in fact, had control of premises.
|
|
| |
Logan v. City of New Haven, File No. CV-04 4002762S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, February 8, 2005, Decided , February 8, 2005, Memorandum Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: A court granted a city and a board of education's motion to strike the third and sixth counts of a student's action for negligence and assault because Conn. Gen. Stat. ? 10-235(a) did not create a direct cause of action allowing a person allegedly injured by a negligent employee of a board of education to sue the board directly.
|
|
| |
Mortgage Elecs. Registration Sys. v. Mendez, 4000349,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NEW LONDON, February 8, 2005, Decided , February 8, 2005, Filed
View this case - free
|
|
|
| |
Nieves v. Hous. Auth. , CV040200048,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD-NORWALK AT STAMFORD, February 8, 2005, Decided , February 8, 2005, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: In plaintiff's personal injury action against a housing authority, the housing authority, as landowner with nondelegable duty to maintain its premises in a reasonably safe condition, could not bring apportionment action under Conn. Gen. Stat. ? 52-572h(c) against independent contractor for whose negligence housing authority was vicariously liable.
|
|
| |
Penske Truck Leasing Co., L.P. v. Portland Asphalt, LLC, CV030101674S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX, AT MIDDLETOWN, February 8, 2005, Decided , February 8, 2005, Filed
View this case - free
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
R.I. Pools, Inc. v. Lillien, CV044000871,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD-NORWALK AT STAMFORD, February 8, 2005, Decided , February 8, 2005, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: A court denied customers' motion to strike a pool company's complaint for breach of contract and foreclosure of a mechanic's lien because, by attaching a copy of the contract to their motion to strike when the contract was not reproduced anywhere in the body of the complaint, the customers made a "speaking motion to strike."
|
|
| |
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|
Worldwide
Feedback
Feedback