 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| AvalonBay Cmtys., Inc. v. Town of Orange, CV 99065826,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF ANSONIA - MILFORD, AT MILFORD, February 9, 2000, Decided , February 9, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where defendants sought to condemn land in order to prevent affordable housing from being built there, plaintiffs were entitled to a permanent injunction; however, plaintiffs could not recover damages under Fair Housing Act.
|
|||||
| Herring v. Signs, CV 990427523, CV99-0427523,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, February 9, 2000, Decided , February 9, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Invasion of privacy by false light claim failed because reckless disregard for falsity of material was not shown. Plaintiff alleged viable claims for appropriation of likeness and negligent infliction of emotional distress.
|
|||||
| Local 134 Ifpte AFL-CIO v. Town of Stratford, CV 980353952,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, February 9, 2000, Decided , February 9, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Union member who chose to litigate discrimination claim in federal court could not have his union re-litigate on the same factual basis in collective bargaining arbitration; the claim was barred under res judicata.
|
|||||
| Patel v. Norwalk Hosp., CV 980164457,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD - NORWALK, AT STAMFORD, February 9, 2000, Decided , February 9, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Medical malpractice action based upon mother's emotional distress over death of fetus before birth was recognized in Connecticut and maintainable alongside wrongful death action; loss of filial consortium was not recognized.
|
|||||
| Ramadon v. Sylvester, CV 980063891S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF ANSONIA - MILFORD, AT DERBY, February 9, 2000, Decided , February 9, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Plaintiffs were entitled to retain deposit, upon defendants' breach of the agreement to purchase real estate, because the amount set out as liquidated damages was reasonable, and the provision was fully explained to defendants.
|
|||||
| Rayonna M., [NO NUMBER IN ORIGINAL],
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX, AT MIDDLETOWN, February 9, 2000, Decided , February 9, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The court ordered the child be committed to the custody of petitioner for a period of one year with the goal of reunification with respondent mother after she developed her parenting skills and kept away from respondent father.
|
|||||
| State v. Gorman, FA980331769S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF DANBURY, AT DANBURY, February 9, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The court granted the mother's petition to recover retroactive child support from the father from the date on which the father's paternity was established, as the petition did not violate a prohibition against retroactive support modification.
|
|||||
| Suh v. Yale Univ., CV 950377911S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, February 9, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Motion to bifurcate trial granted because plaintiff's failure to fully disclose psychiatric treatment to defendant until three weeks before trial, prejudiced defendant's ability to defend on damages and plaintiff was not prejudiced.
|
|||||
| Yellow Page Consultants v. Insurance Ctr. of New Eng., CV 990590709S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD - NEW BRITAIN, AT HARTFORD, February 9, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
