 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Torgerson v. Sarah Tuxis Residential Servs., (AC 23637),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, February 10, 2004, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A conveyance deed was clear in incorporating a map by reference, and the trial court correctly identified the map as including only a pedestrian right-of-way instead of a general right-of-way.
|
|||||
| Vitale v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals, 566540,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NEW LONDON, February 10, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Statute specific to appeals of zoning decisions governed over a more general statute addressing service upon public entities. Since service of a zoning appeal was not made in accordance with the specific statute, motion to reargue was denied.
|
|||||
| W. Boot & Clothing Co. v. L'Enfance Magique, (AC 23771),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, February 10, 2004, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Sublessor had standing to bring a summary process action against a sublessee for nonpayment of rent despite the statute's failure to list a sublessor as an owner. Further, the sublessor had a beneficial interest in the premises.
|
|||||
| Wyman v. Wyman, FA030733009,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, February 10, 2004, Decided , February 10, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Although mother felt that daycare for the parties' child would have been eliminated if the mother had custody since the mother worked at home, the court believed that the present shared custody arrangement was in the best interests of the child.
|
|||||
| Zaretsky v. Cimo, CV030482508,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, February 10, 2004, Decided , February 10, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Complaint which alleged that motorist's actions were reckless, violated three traffic statutes, and caused injuries, comported with a statute authorizing double or treble damages for deliberate or reckless disregard in operating a vehicle.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
