 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Appell v. Browner, CV 99059187S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD - NEW BRITAIN, AT HARTFORD, December 30, 1999, Decided , December 30, 1999, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant physician's making the same misreading on several successive x-rays was sufficient to constitute reckless misconduct, and allowed as claim separate from negligence claim.
|
|||||
| Campanaro v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals Trumbull, CV 970343740,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, December 30, 1999, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Zoning board decision allowing neighbor to construct fence was reversed because record did not reflect legally cognizable hardship which would justify variance from zoning regulations.
|
|||||
| Czarsty v. Deleon, CV 990154033,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, AT WATERBURY, December 30, 1999, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where plaintiffs' complaint alleged damages resulting from loss of consortium, not a separate claim for bystander emotional distress, defendants' motion to strike that portion of the complaint was denied.
|
|||||
| Fisher v. McDonald's Corp., CV 990589299S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD - NEW BRITAIN, AT HARTFORD, December 30, 1999, Decided , December 30, 1999, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Motion to strike was granted regarding plaintiff father's emotional damages claims, plaintiffs' loss of consortium claims, and all of plaintiffs' claims except the products liability claims.
|
|||||
| Gagne v. Vaccaro, CV 950372611S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, December 30, 1999, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Plaintiff in fee dispute between attorneys could not use alleged bad faith conduct of defendant toward client to avoid application of rule that absence of written contingency fee agreement barred collection of attorneys fee.
|
|||||
| Heath v. Micropatent, CV 97401481,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, December 30, 1999, Decided , December 30, 1999, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Plaintiffs failed to make any of the requisite allegations to support either a monopolization claim or an attempt-to-monopolize claim. Plaintiffs failed to define the relevant market alleged to be harmed.
|
|||||
| Lucisano v. Morales, CV 980148990,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, AT WATERBURY, December 30, 1999, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where driver of leased car involved in accident was not authorized driver, vicarious liability could not be imposed on car leasing agent.
|
|||||
| Michalek v. Michalek, FA 980719857S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD - NEW BRITAIN, AT HARTFORD, December 30, 1999, Decided , December 30, 1999, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Marriage of husband and wife was dissolved, and their property was distributed according to statutory factors. Joint legal custody of the minor children was granted.
|
|||||
| Millan v. Warden, CV 950546704,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD - NEW BRITAIN, AT HARTFORD, December 30, 1999, Decided , December 30, 1999, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
