 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Beeman v. Guilford Planning & Zoning Comm'n, CV 990427275,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, April 27, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Zoning commission acted without authority in imposing a condition personal to defendant (permit was void on transfer of property) in approving special use permit, and because condition was invalid action was reversed.
|
|||||
| Blumenthal v. Barnes, PJRCV 990430843S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, April 27, 2000, Decided , April 27, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Attorney general had standing, based on statutory authority, to sue corporate officer for breach of fiduciary duty for alleged misuse of charitable donations received by the corporation for the operation of a public school.
|
|||||
| Cjp Designs v. Peter Leers Gmbh, CV 990171751,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD - NORWALK, AT STAMFORD, April 27, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: No breach of contract when plaintiff did not prove any agreement between the parties for hourly or services pay and plaintiff was not entitled to recover on theory of unjust enrichment because evidence supported payment on contingency basis.
|
|||||
| Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Co. v. Commissioner of Revenue Servs., File Nos. CV980492508S, CV980492509S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, TAX SESSION, April 27, 2000, Memorandum Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The commonly understood meaning of the term "hazardous waste" was used to interpret the statute that power generation plant operators contended excluded them from the imposition of a sales tax.
|
|||||
| Corso v. American Med. Response of Conn., CV 9890411625S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, April 27, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant ambulance owner's motion for summary judgment in plaintiff's personal injury lawsuit, was granted, since the facts of the case rebutted the statutory presumption that defendant driver was defendant owner's agent.
|
|||||
| First City Bank v. Aldi, CV 970479166S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD - NEW BRITAIN, AT NEW BRITAIN, April 27, 2000, Decided , April 27, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Motion for sanctions for alleged discovery misconduct denied where conduct creating the confusion complained of occurred during three-day weekend and none of the alleged acts arose to level of intentional harassment.
|
|||||
| Garrison v. Planning Bd. of Stamford, CV 990172754S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD - NORWALK, AT STAMFORD, April 27, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Planning board properly dismissed landowner's application to subdivide her real property because planning board lacked the authority to approve the subdivision because there were current, outstanding zoning violations.
|
|||||
| In the Interest of Ashley E., [NO NUMBER IN ORIGINAL],
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX, AT MIDDLETOWN, CHILD PROTECTION SESSION, JUVENILE MATTERS, April 27, 2000, Decided , April 27, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: After statutory grounds for termination of parental rights had been established by clear and convincing evidence, a determination of the child's best interest warranted termination of appellant's parental rights.
|
|||||
| Knapp v. Environmental Comm'n of New Canaan, CV 960152111S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD - NORWALK, AT STAMFORD, April 27, 2000, Decided , April 27, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court concluded that decision of defendant local inland wetlands agency approving an application for a license to conduct regulated activities on certain real property was not illegal, arbitrary, or an abuse of discretion.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
