 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| 37 Huntington St. v. City of Hartford, CV 990590607,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD - NEW BRITAIN, AT HARTFORD, February 10, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: City tax liens attached to underlying property in which the FDIC had a mortgage interest, not an ownership interest, so receivership rules applicable to FDIC did not bar tax liens while mortgage held in receivership by FDIC.
|
|||||
| Carlyle Johnson Mach. Co. v. April, CV 970481243S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD - NEW BRITAIN, AT NEW BRITAIN, February 10, 2000, Decided , February 10, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Rights to a patent were awarded to the party that took former owner out of bankruptcy; defendant inventors could not appropriate results of the collaboration with former owner, and claim was not barred by res judicata.
|
|||||
| Citibank v. Gifesman, CV 970573275S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD - NEW BRITAIN, AT HARTFORD, February 10, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Credit card account use by secondary user, total stranger, was authorized by account holder based on assurances of repayment by third party, and bank acted in commercially reasonable manner concerning excessive charges.
|
|||||
| Commercial Realty & Dev. v. Ravel, SPNH 981156774,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, February 10, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In action for nonpayment of rent, judgment was in favor of defendant because plaintiff's injury was reparable and defendant, if put out of possession, would have suffered loss wholly disproportionate to plaintiff's injury.
|
|||||
| Durso v. Aquilino, CV 95050389,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF ANSONIA - MILFORD, AT MILFORD, February 10, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Plaintiff's motion to set aside verdict was denied since there was no improperly admitted hearsay, plaintiff did not timely object to certain defense counsel comments, and there was no jury misconduct, as plaintiff argued.
|
|||||
| Huhn v. Goldstone-Orly, CV 980352421S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, February 10, 2000, Decided , February 10, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Loss of filial consortium was not actionable but allegations of relationship, child's injuries, and parents' emotional injuries, and inferred contemporaneous perception of malpractice, alleged bystander emotional distress.
|
|||||
| Kayla D., [NO NUMBER IN ORIGINAL],
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX, AT MIDDLETOWN, JUVENILE MATTERS, CHILD PROTECTION SESSION, February 10, 2000, Decided , February 10, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Parental rights of a mother were terminated after the Department of Children and Families proved that the mother was not able to be a parent to the child, and that she could not become able to do so in a reasonable time.
|
|||||
| McQuillan v. Engelman, X06CV 990153482S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, AT WATERBURY, February 10, 2000, Decided , February 10, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because mobile home park residents and homeowner's association's litigation was financed by developer competing with defendants and association agreed not to settle the case, motion to certify as a class action was denied.
|
|||||
| McQuillan v. Engelman, X06CV 990153482S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, AT WATERBURY, February 10, 2000, Decided , February 10, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Mobile home park residents had no statutory right to compel specific performance to purchase property, but had statutory right to notice and to exercise rights, upon sale by owners to a third party for different uses.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
