 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Armetta v. Wheelabrator Techs., X01CV980154590S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, COMPLEX LITIGATION DOCKET, AT WATERBURY, February 7, 2001, Decided , February 7, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendants' motion to strike plaintiffs' claim alleging conversion was denied because the basis of the motion was the statute of limitations and plaintiffs had not attempted to allege in their complaint their response to such a defense.
|
|||||
| Bonk v. Bonk, FA000372055S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, February 7, 2001, Decided , February 7, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Despite husband's fault, Connecticut court did not award alimony or attorneys' fees to wife who had sufficient salary to live on, where there was no indication that husband would ever again have high earning capacity.
|
|||||
| City of Bridgeport v. Admiral Assocs., CV980358277S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN AT NEW HAVEN, February 7, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Since statute did not include petroleum products and defendant did not allege whether nuisance was permanent or continuous, plaintiff's claims were not barred by the statute of limitations period.
|
|||||
| Daversa v. Dale Constr., CV000436384S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN AT NEW HAVEN, February 7, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Plaintiffs met their burden of proof on their claims for defective tile floors and an inadequate water pump, but failed to prove defective workmanship concerning water stained ceilings or that defendant's acts were unfair or deceptive.
|
|||||
| Denardo v. Bergamo, FA980148318S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, AT WATERBURY, February 7, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Grandparents could not claim separate visitation under Connecticut law unless it was found to be in child's best interests. Rights of grandparents who impermissibly intruded on liberty interest of fit mother were limited.
|
|||||
| Fredericks v. Smith, CV990065588S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF ANSONIA - MILFORD, AT DERBY, February 7, 2001, Decided , February 7, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Summary judgment was proper where moving party filed an affidavit which supplied sufficient evidence of non-negligence, and opposing party failed to file an opposing affidavit.
|
|||||
| Gramazio v. Sikorsky Aircraft Corp., X01CV000160391,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, COMPLEX LITIGATION DOCKET, AT WATERBURY, February 7, 2001, Decided , February 7, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Single pollution incident was actionable under unfair trade practices act because there was no specific statutory language or court holding to the contrary. Customers of polluter could allege breach of covenant of good faith and fair dealing.
|
|||||
| Hill v. Pizzo, CV980579951,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, February 7, 2001, Decided , February 7, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In order to recover for negligence which led to the sinking of a boat, the boat owner or its insurance company was required to demonstrate that the friend using the boat or the slip rental company owed some kind of duty to the boat owner.
|
|||||
| In re Elana H., [NO NUMBER IN ORIGINAL],
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, AT WATERBURY, JUVENILE MATTERS, February 7, 2001, Decided , February 7, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Juvenile court granted mother's request for hearing to enforce court ordered visitation where its inherent statutory authority included ability to enforce orders and its responsibilities included resolving issues involving care of children.
|
|||||
| In re Elana H., [NO NUMBER IN ORIGINAL],
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, AT WATERBURY, JUVENILE MATTERS, February 7, 2001, Decided , February 7, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Agency petition to terminate parental rights was not inconsistent with its simultaneous offer to allow parent to visit her children. Even if termination was statutorily warranted, continued contact could be in the best interest of the children.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
