|
|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases —
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case —
for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
|
| |
State Courts -
Connecticut - March 21, 2002
|
| |
Bartlett v. Capital Research, CV990175131S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD-NORWALK, AT STAMFORD, March 21, 2002, Decided , March 21, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: As defendant did not establish that Kansas court lacked jurisdiction, there was insufficient evidence to deny plaintiff's motion for summary judgment, as default judgment entered by Kansas court was enforceable against defendant in Connecticut.
|
|
| |
Conn. Elec. Equip. Co. v. United States Fid. & Guar. Co., CV000274894S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT MERIDEN, March 21, 2002, Decided , March 21, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Third-tier subcontractor on Connecticut public works project could not recover on prime contractors' payment bond, nor could it recover from primes under theories of breach of contract or unjust enrichment.
|
|
| |
Diaz v. Warden, CV992919,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TOLLAND, AT ROCKVILLE, March 21, 2002, Decided , March 21, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Pre-sentence confinement credit was not granted for inmate's confinement in Hawai'i while awaiting extradition to Connecticut after he turned himself into authorities.
|
|
| |
|
| |
Goodman v. Goodman, FA900513165S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NEW LONDON, March 21, 2002, Decided , March 21, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
|
|
| |
Hoffnagle v. Henderson, CV020813972S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, March 21, 2002, Decided , March 21, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Noncompetition agreement that precluded accountant from serving former employer's company clients for five years after leaving employment was enforceable in Connecticut, with limitations inherent in contract language.
|
|
| |
Homecoming Fin. Network v. McDermott, CV010453370S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, March 21, 2002, Decided , March 21, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Facts alleged did not support mortgagor's claim that transaction of note and mortgage was either procedurally or substantively unconscionable. He was not unfairly surprised by the terms and he accepted the loan transaction voluntarily.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Ryan v. Town of Kent, CV0083887,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF LITCHFIELD, AT LITCHFIELD, March 21, 2002, Decided , March 21, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Trial court articulated decision to grant company summary judgment, explaining that company had no duty to injured party regarding sidewalk defect, absent evidence that company had, or retained, possession and control over associated premises.
|
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|
Worldwide
Feedback
Feedback