|
|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases —
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case —
for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
|
| |
State Courts -
Connecticut - February 11, 2004
|
| |
Brancato v. Kaye, CV980166517S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD-NORWALK AT STAMFORD, February 11, 2004, Decided , February 11, 2004, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: The buyers' motion to reopen was timely because it was filed within four months of the time when they discovered there was a judgment to open. Since there was a reasonable basis for their not hiring an attorney, the matter was reopened.
|
|
| |
Bridgeport Redevelopment Agency v. Silva, CV990366777S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, February 11, 2004, Decided , February 11, 2004, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: In an appeal of a condemnation award, the court determined that an agency undervalued the property in question in making the award, but denied the former owners' claim that they were entitled to more than the fair market value of the property.
|
|
| |
Butler v. Long, CV030090334S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF LITCHFIELD, AT LITCHFIELD, February 11, 2004, Decided , February 11, 2004, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: An estate administrator's motion to strike an alleged alcohol provider's special defense was denied because contributory negligence was available as a defense to an action by a third party against one who provided alcohol to a minor.
|
|
| |
Coccoli v. Leli, CV000160861S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, AT WATERBURY, February 11, 2004, Decided , February 11, 2004, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Where an agent and home seller entered into valid listing agreement that provided for attorneys fees to the prevailing party should there be a dispute, agent was entitled to commission for introducing property to buyer, and attorneys fees and costs.
|
|
| |
Falling Water, LLC v. Rocky Glen Hydro L.P., CV010343596S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF DANBURY, AT DANBURY, February 11, 2004, Decided , February 11, 2004, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Court lacked jurisdiction over limited partnership's motion to open default judgment filed after four-month period for such motions expired. Motion to open filed by general partner did not change result as he lacked authority to do so.
|
|
| |
Galpin v. Graham, CV000370306,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, February 11, 2004, Decided , February 11, 2004, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Injured party's proposed amended complaint was not barred by statute of limitations where amended allegations did not allege new cause of action against the owner but rather specified a basis of liability against one already a party to the action.
|
|
| |
|
| |
Lutter v. Kay, CV000161393S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, AT WATERBURY, February 11, 2004, Decided , February 11, 2004, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Court denied defendant's motion to set aside verdict for plaintiff in personal injury suit arising from rear-end collision, and motion for JNOV and remittitur. Evidence of speed supported jury's finding that defendant's conduct was reckless.
|
|
| |
Page v. Page, FA020068784,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WINDHAM, AT PUTNAM, February 11, 2004, Decided , February 11, 2004, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Where a husband had net income of $ 779 per week and the wife had a net income of $ 596 per week, the husband was ordered to pay child support of $ 250 per week for the parties' three children and alimony of $ 100 per week.
|
|
| |
Price v. Marsh, CV010185035S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD-NORWALK AT STAMFORD, February 11, 2004, Decided , February 11, 2004, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Where a second individual charged crimes of moral turpitude to which infamous penalties were attached, the words were slanderous and actionable per se; the first individual was entitled to general and punitive damages and attorney's fees.
|
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|
Worldwide
Feedback
Feedback