 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Advanced Fin. Servs. v. Savers Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co., CV040833347,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, February 9, 2005, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The subrogee failed to allege sufficient facts to support a claim under the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act because the subrogee failed to allege sufficient facts that the insurer's denial of meritorious claims was a general business practice pursuant to Conn. Gen. Stat. ¿ 38a-816(6).
|
|||||
| Arbusto v. Estate of Perkins, CV030082016S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF ANSONIA - MILFORD, AT MILFORD, February 9, 2005, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Statute of limitations pursuant to Conn. Gen. Stat. ¿ 52-584 when read in conjunction with Conn. Gen. Stat. ¿ 45a-375(c) made summary judgment appropriate in plaintiff's personal injury suit against decedent's estate. The death of decedent, which occurred after plaintiff was injured on his property, but before she filed suit, did not toll statute.
|
|||||
| Blakemar Constr. v. CRS Eng'g Inc., CV040412727S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, February 9, 2005, Decided , February 9, 2005, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Motion to disqualify the buyer's attorney was denied without prejudice because the sellers failed to provide any evidence or allege any facts which would indicate that the buyer's attorney was a necessary witness in the case.
|
|||||
| Estate of Greathouse v. Northwestern Mut. Life Ins. Co., CV030194765,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD-NORWALK AT STAMFORD, February 9, 2005, Decided , February 9, 2005, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where insurance agent failed to change beneficiary of decedent's life insurance policy to decedent's estate, trial court struck estate's breach of contract action against agent. Because agent was known by decedent and estate to have been acting on behalf of insurer, which was principal, agent could not be held liable for insurer's nonperformance.
|
|||||
| Gombard v. Zurich Ins. Co., CV030482001,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, February 9, 2005, Decided , February 9, 2005, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Arbitration award did not err in denying injured party's claim for underinsured motorist benefits under antique automobile policy issued by insurer. Policy did not insure injured party's modern vehicle, and it was not required to extend underinsured motorist coverage to modern vehicle's driver if it did not extend liability coverage thereto.
|
|||||
| Gottier's Furniture, LLC v. Lapointe, CV040084606,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TOLLAND, AT ROCKVILLE, February 9, 2005, Decided , February 9, 2005, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Griffin v. Warden, York Corr. Inst., 557131,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NEW LONDON, February 9, 2005, Decided , February 9, 2005, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The prisoner's habeas corpus action challenging her murder conviction, Conn. Gen. Stat. ¿ 53a-54a, was denied; the prisoner did not receive ineffective assistance of counsel as counsel fully advised her of her right to testify and correctly advised her not to testify as counsel could not predict exactly what the prisoner would say on the stand.
|
|||||
| Hebert v. Assurance Co. of Am., CV040084733S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF ANSONIA - MILFORD, AT MILFORD, February 9, 2005, Decided , February 9, 2005, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where an insured sufficiently pled that his insurer, rather than investigate claims fairly and pay them reasonably, engaged in a pattern of bad faith conduct in which claims were neither fairly investigated nor timely paid, his pleading was sufficient to show the insurer engaged in unfair settlement practices under Conn. Gen. Stat. ¿ 38a-816(6).
|
|||||
| In re Abigail B., K09CP03009076C, K09CP03009077C, K09CP03009078C, K09CP03009079C,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, COMPLEX LITIGATION DOCKET AT NEW LONDON, February 9, 2005, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where the parents filed a motion to reconsider the denial of their motion to vacate orders of temporary custody, it could not be determined whether they were collaterally attacking the orders of temporary custody, which would have been improper, or whether they sought to modify the orders pursuant to Conn. Gen. Stat. ¿ 46b-56, which was allowed.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
