 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Murray v. Interlude, Inc., CV 990335780S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF DANBURY, AT DANBURY, February 10, 2000, Decided , February 10, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Motion to dismiss was granted since defendant had to file own claim with claims commissioner, as a possible waiver of immunity in suit brought by plaintiff could not be stretched to include defendant's apportionment claim.
|
|||||
| New Haven Bd. of Educ. v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals, 428018,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, February 10, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Board of education had standing to challenge zoning board's grant of a variance near school based upon board of education's duty to provide an appropriate learning environment and safe school setting within the school.
|
|||||
| Pisano v. Termite, 551800,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NEW LONDON, February 10, 2000, Decided , February 10, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: State law claims for failure to warn of dangers of a pesticide were not preempted by federal chemical labeling guidelines because state retained right to regulate use of the pesticide by applicator of product.
|
|||||
| Raymond v. Norwalk Zoning Bd. of Appeal, CV 990366025S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, February 10, 2000, Decided , February 10, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a zoning appeals action, a court could reverse, affirm, modify or revise a decision in a zoning appeal, but there was no authority to allow a counterclaim seeking relief and monetary damages.
|
|||||
| Roberts v. Ton-Yong, CV 980486909S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD - NEW BRITAIN, AT NEW BRITAIN, February 10, 2000, Decided , February 10, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Motion in limine was granted to prevent expert treating orthopedic from testifying as to plaintiff's alleged shoulder injury in her negligence action arising from car accident. Motion was denied as to other witnesses.
|
|||||
| State v. O'Connor, MV 960287563S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD - NORWALK, AT NORWALK, February 10, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant was entitled to have urine sample results suppressed as they were beyond the scope of items specifically listed in the State's search warrant and would not have ultimately been discovered as they were privileged.
|
|||||
| Tricon Int'l v. United Constr., X06CV 980153502S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, AT WATERBURY, February 10, 2000, Decided , February 10, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Motion for protective order granted where even when stringent objective test was applied, totality of circumstances mandated that conversation between counsel and proposed expert was subject to attorney-client privilege.
|
|||||
| Vitale v. Ravizza Bros., CV 990497335S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD - NEW BRITAIN, AT NEW BRITAIN, February 10, 2000, Decided , February 10, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Plaintiff alleged sufficient factual allegations to fit within "substantial certainty theory" exception to workers' compensation statute, so defendant's motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction was denied.
|
|||||
| Yankee Linen Supply Co. v. Baxter, CV 980165515,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD - NORWALK, AT STAMFORD, February 10, 2000, Decided , February 10, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Judgment in breach of contract action entered against corporation only where president disclosed he was acting for corporation and contracting parties did not intend to make president personally liable.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
