 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Michaud v. Woodbury Realty Co., CV400500,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, February 7, 2002, Decided , February 7, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Worker was employer's employee on date of accident rather than general partner's employee. Therefore, tort action against employer was barred by exclusivity provision of workers' compensation act.
|
|||||
| Nave v. Rivera, 552716,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NEW LONDON, February 7, 2002, Decided , February 7, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Although insurer had right to apportionment of liability under Connecticut statute, insurer's apportionment complaint against driver in negligence action was procedurally improper and unnecessary because driver was party to action.
|
|||||
| Ranciato v. Nolan, CV970401729S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, February 7, 2002, Decided , February 7, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: There was no competition for employer's customers. Time and geographic limitations were unreasonable, as they did not protect legitimate interests. Employer had no financial loss; liquidated damages were unenforceable.
|
|||||
| Town of Coventry v. Hastings, CV980066824,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TOLLAND, AT ROCKVILLE, February 7, 2002, Decided , February 7, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In town's action to foreclose municipal tax liens it held on owner's real property, owner's claim of estoppel based on an alleged agreement unrelated to the making, validity, or enforcement of the liens was not a proper defense.
|
|||||
| Trading Direct v. La Russo, CV010382217S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, February 7, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Husband, who opposed confirmation of arbitration award, had right to judicial determination of arbitration agreement's validity as to him, even though he did not raise that issue to arbitrators or in motion to vacate, modify, or correct award.
|
|||||
| Wezenski v. Cornerstone Constr. Servs., CV980086644S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX, AT MIDDLETOWN, February 7, 2002, Decided , February 7, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Contractor breached contract with homeowners where he, inter alia, failed to install footing drains around entire foundation, failed to install flooring in accordance with industry standards, and failed to install deck piers according to code.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
