|
|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases —
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case —
for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more.
lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
|
| |
State Courts -
Connecticut - February 11, 2004
|
| |
Reliance Nat'l Indem. Co. v. Automated Waste Disposal, Inc., CV030350004S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF DANBURY, AT DANBURY, February 11, 2004, Decided , February 11, 2004, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Summary judgment on an insurance company's claim for unpaid insurance premiums was denied where the insurance company only established that there was some period of coverage and that it was not paid for any coverage.
|
|
| |
|
| |
Wilson v. Jefferson, CV980398547,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, February 11, 2004, Decided , February 11, 2004, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: A motion for judgment on the pleadings was in reality a motion for summary judgment, and since there were many contested issues, the motion was denied. A motion in limine should have been presented to the trier of fact at the time of trial.
|
|
| |
Wise v. Zoning Comm'n of Simsbury, CV000802318S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, February 11, 2004, Decided , February 11, 2004, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: A zoning commission's failure to hold a public hearing on a selectperson's petition to amend a regulation to permit logos on newspaper tubes did not void the amendment. The statutory timing requirements were directory rather than mandatory.
|
|
| |
Woods v. Warden, CV000598785,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, February 11, 2004, Decided , February 11, 2004, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: The intent of the legislature was clearly not to permit release of a person convicted of murder notwithstanding the decision of a habeas court. The inmate would have been with friends and could easily misconstrue another threat against him.
|
|
| |
Wright v. Radgowski, 565525,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NEW LONDON, February 11, 2004, Decided , February 11, 2004, Filed
View this case - free
|
|
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|