|
|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases —
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case —
for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more.
lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
|
| |
State Courts -
Connecticut - February 9, 2005
|
| |
Redzepagic v. Greenwich Taxi, X05CV030194157S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD-NORWALK, COMPLEX LITIGATION DOCKET, AT STAMFORD, February 9, 2005, Decided , February 9, 2005, Filed
View this case - free
|
|
|
| |
Rich Taubman Assocs. v. Sweeney Todd's Hair Design, SPNO30972,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD-NORWALK, HOUSING SESSION AT NORWALK, February 9, 2005, Decided , February 9, 2005, Filed
View this case - free
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Zweeres v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals, CV030082790S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF ANSONIA - MILFORD, AT MILFORD, February 9, 2005, Decided , February 9, 2005, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: A court remanded an order from a city zoning board denying a property owner's application for certification of a parcel of land, which was a nonconforming lot, as a building lot because the record did not reflect any findings by the zoning board as to its consideration of the four requirements set out under Milford, Conn., Zoning Regs. § 6.4.
|
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|