 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Perlotto v. Waters, CV020469200S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, February 11, 2003, Decided , February 11, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where an inmate received personal injury settlement proceeds, the State enjoyed the benefit of a statutory lien, as the funds were within the statute's mandate. The proceeds, also as a matter of law, did not qualify for an exemption.
|
|||||
| Rocque v. D.H. Willliams, CV010807744,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, February 11, 2003, Decided , February 11, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Construction activities of an owner and its agent resulted in an unintentional violation of Connecticut law and were not shown to have caused damages claimed by the Commissioner of Environmental Protection; however, fine and injunction were imposed.
|
|||||
| Sciortino v. Town of Oxford, CV010074801S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF ANSONIA - MILFORD, GEOGRAPHICAL AREA 5 AT DERBY, February 11, 2003, Decided , February 11, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Record supported zoning board of appeals' judgment that road where builder wanted to construct building was a public road and that zoning commission complied with town's zoning regulations when it approved builder's application for building permit.
|
|||||
| Snell v. Beamon, 560163,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NEW LONDON, February 11, 2003, Decided , February 11, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The trial court granted an injured party's motion for an additur of a jury award in an auto accident case, because the award of damages shocked the sense of justice and could not have been reached without mistake, partiality, or prejudice.
|
|||||
| State v. Francis D., (AC 21599),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, February 11, 2003, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The social worker was qualified to testify as an expert in the field of social work and about the behavioral characteristics of child sex abuse victims. Defendant did not object as to the sufficiency of her qualifications.
|
|||||
| State v. Gibson, (AC 21779),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, February 11, 2003, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The convictions of sexual assault in the second degree and risk of injury to a child were reversed and a new trial ordered because the trial court failed to instruct the jury as to the proper use of the uncharged misconduct evidence and as to time.
|
|||||
| State v. Pranckus, (AC 21265),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, February 11, 2003, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant failed to prove self-defense because he could not have believed that he was faced with deadly physical force at the hands of the two boys, he was the initial aggressor, and as it was not his house involved, he had a duty to retreat.
|
|||||
| Terracino v. Fairway Asset Mgmt., (AC 21888),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, February 11, 2003, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Evidence supported finding that promisors did not exercise due diligence to discover evidence before trial in action seeking foreclosure of promissory note, and trial court did not abuse its discretion by denying promisors' petition for a new trial.
|
|||||
| Travelers Prop. Cas. Corp. v. Cgu Ins., CV000599177S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, February 11, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Subsequent insurer was granted summary judgment on insurer's claim to recover sums paid on claim where insurer failed to cancel policy issued to company by reporting so to workers' compensation board in accordance with statutory requirement.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
