|
|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases —
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case —
for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
|
| |
State Courts -
Connecticut - March 22, 2002
|
| |
Arnone v. Conn. Light & Power Co., X01CV980168276,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, COMPLEX LITIGATION DOCKET AT WATERBURY, March 22, 2002, Decided , March 22, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: The town did not select or entrustment leadership to the fire chief. The condition that caused decedent's death was not a dangerous condition created by the town with the substantial certainty that an employee would be injured or killed.
|
|
| |
Comm'r of Transp. v. Hook N' Needle, CV980166840,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD-NORWALK, AT STAMFORD, March 22, 2002, Decided , March 22, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Property owner's appraisal for reassessment of damages from transportation commissioner's partial and temporary taking while repairing a bridge was adopted. as impact of construction necessitated a rental concession.
|
|
| |
Crawford v. Calayag, FA010344498S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF DANBURY, AT DANBURY, March 22, 2002, Decided , March 22, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Court had jurisdiction to stay mother's motion to transfer child custody and paternity action to New York pending determination by New York court of its jurisdiction.
|
|
| |
Dsm, Inc. v. Sentry Select Ins. Co., CV010085405S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF LITCHFIELD, AT LITCHFIELD, March 22, 2002, Decided , March 22, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Defendants' motion to strike a count alleging breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing was denied; an insured adequately pled the three elements of the claim by alleging defendants maliciously breached surety obligations.
|
|
| |
|
| |
Falkenham v. Falkenham, FA99065047,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF ANSONIA - MILFORD, AT MILFORD, March 22, 2002, Decided , March 22, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Child support and alimony payments were to be made pursuant to immediate wage withholding order. Parties were entitled to tax exemptions based thereon.
|
|
| |
In re Alexandra C., [NO NUMBER IN ORIGINAL],
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX, JUVENILE MATTERS AT MIDDLETOWN, March 22, 2002, Decided , March 22, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Parents both had long-term problems with mental illness. State agency proved they failed to achieve rehabilitation, and their rights were terminated as to the child.
|
|
| |
In re Elizabeth R., [NO NUMBER IN ORIGINAL],
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD-NORWALK, JUVENILE MATTERS AT NORWALK, March 22, 2002, Decided , March 22, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Discovery motion in dependency case was denied where much of requested material had been provided, and court was unable to find that rest of requested material was not otherwise obtainable or that discovery would not have unduly delayed case.
|
|
| |
|
| |
Richardson v. Williams, CV990426094,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, March 22, 2002, Decided , March 22, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: As general rule, plaintiff could not have prevailed in legal malpractice action in Connecticut unless he presented expert testimony to establish standard of proper professional skill or care.
|
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|