 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Catton v. Catton, FA990363660S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, February 13, 2003, Decided , February 13, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: An alimony award was reduced where, since the entry of the original decree, the wife had become employed and her income had increased, and the husband had become unemployed and his income had decreased.
|
|||||
| Coburn v. Universal Foods Stores of Noank, 563074,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NEW LONDON, February 13, 2003, Decided , February 13, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a couple's action against property owners seeking damages for injuries the wife allegedly sustained in a fall, the failure to list the husband as a party on the summons did not divest the court of personal jurisdiction over the property owners.
|
|||||
| Ferrer v. Edwards, CV000439399S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, February 13, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: An insured sufficiently pled bad faith against an insurer alleging denial of benefits as she was a foreigner and unable to speak English. These claims, taken as true, supported ill will claim on the part of the insurer in denying benefits.
|
|||||
| Karp v. Karp, FA930531939,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, February 13, 2003, Decided , February 13, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Laudatti v. Planning & Zoning Comm'n, CV010807790,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, February 13, 2003, Decided , February 13, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where a town planning and zoning commission failed to properly publish notice of a potential zoning change with respect to more than one lot, it had no jurisdiction to change the zoning for several lots, for which no notice had been provided.
|
|||||
| Lewis v. Clinton Planning & Zoning Comm'n, X06CV960154803S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, COMPLEX LITIGATION DOCKET AT WATERBURY, February 13, 2003, Decided , February 13, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A property owner whose wetlands map was presented in connection with an application to conduct a regulated activity differed from the town wetlands map had no duty to seek an amendment to the town map.
|
|||||
| McKnight v. Warden, CV940001955,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TOLLAND, AT ROCKVILLE, February 13, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Petitioner's original habeas counsel was not ineffective for improperly withdrawing his claim that his guilty pleas were involuntary; the trial court's colloquy with petitioner established the voluntariness of the pleas.
|
|||||
| Pelliccione v. Pelliccione, FA010342220S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF DANBURY, AT DANBURY, February 13, 2003, Decided , February 13, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The parties' marriage was dissolved and the parties were declared to be single and unmarried, the husband was ordered to pay child support and alimony to the wife, and the parties were awarded joint legal custody of their children.
|
|||||
| Royal Ins. Co. v. Prudential Residential Servs., L.P., CV010185458,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD-NORWALK AT STAMFORD, February 13, 2003, Decided , February 13, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A property seller could not assert a counterclaim against an insurer who had sued the seller in its capacity as subrogee of its insureds where the counterclaim was based on the tortious conduct of the insureds.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
