 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Blakemar Constr., LLC v. CRS Eng'g, Inc., CV040412727S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, February 10, 2005, Decided , February 10, 2005, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The sellers failed to show that the purchaser's counsel had to be disqualified under Conn. R. Prof. Conduct 3.7(a). The sellers failed to show that the testimony of the purchaser's counsel was truly necessary as they did not provide any evidence, nor did they allege any facts, that indicated that the purchaser's counsel was a necessary witness.
|
|||||
| Cook v. Warden, File No. CV-03 0004199S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TOLLAND, AT ROCKVILLE, February 10, 2005, Decided , February 10, 2005, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Prisoner's habeas corpus petition challenging the denial of an application for parole was dismissed; the prisoner failed to show that a state agency used a quota system in granting paroles which favored Black and Hispanic inmates over White inmates, and thus failed to show that his due process rights under Conn. Const. art. I, § 20, were violated.
|
|||||
| Crawford v. Coleman, CV040831039S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, February 10, 2005, Decided , February 10, 2005, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a negligence case, summary judgment was denied to a car lessor because evidence showing that a driver was not authorized by a rental agreement and the driver's testimony regarding her age was insufficient to rebut the presumption of agency under Conn. Gen. Stat. § 52-183.
|
|||||
| Dyke v. Dyke, FA010187101S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD-NORWALK AT STAMFORD, February 10, 2005, Decided , February 10, 2005, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In divorce action, parties were awarded joint legal custody of minor child; husband was ordered to pay weekly child support and to maintain health insurance for the minor. The wife was awarded 75 percent of escrow proceeds from the sale of marital home and was ordered to assign all her stock in company she and the husband started to the husband.
|
|||||
| Floyd v. Warden, State Prison, CV000803561S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, February 10, 2005, Decided , February 10, 2005, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A petition for a writ of habeas corpus was denied because an inmate did not receive ineffective assistance of counsel; it would have been speculative to find errors since the attorney was deceased, and there was no prejudice since there were several witnesses that identified the inmate as the shooter in a murder case.
|
|||||
| Girard v. Girard, CV030825089S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, February 10, 2005, Decided , February 10, 2005, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because the material provided to a court established a good faith basis for a stepdaughter's child abuse claim against her stepfather, the court would review any records of the stepfather's stay in an institution that were subject to the psychologist-patient privilege in Conn. Gen. Stat. § 52-146c(c)(4) with any eye toward relevance.
|
|||||
| Harvey Morse, P.A. v. Brunnock, CV044000486S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, AT WATERBURY, February 10, 2005, Decided , February 10, 2005, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Respondents' summary judgment motion was granted as to a genealogy company's mandamus action to compel a probate court to allow the company's appeal of an award to an heir, whom the company had located, as the company had an adequate remedy at law in the form of a Florida action to enforce a fee agreement between the company and the heir.
|
|||||
| In re Christopher C., NO5CP01012320-A,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, JUVENILE MATTERS AT NEW HAVEN, February 10, 2005, Decided , February 10, 2005, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Connecticut Department of Children and Families failed to show that mother failed to rehabilitate under Conn. Gen. Stat. § 17a-112(j)(3)(B)(i) as of time of filing of petition to terminate parental rights. She had been in substantial or full compliance with court-ordered specific steps from time child was removed until petition was filed.
|
|||||
| In re Corrina F., N05CP011228A,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX, CHILD PROTECTION SESSION AT MIDDLETOWN, February 10, 2005, Decided , February 10, 2005, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Parents' parental rights were terminated, after weighing the factors of Conn. Gen. Stat. § 17a-112; both parents had substance abuse problems, neither parent complied with the majority of the specific steps ordered by the court, and the child had resided in the same foster home since she was 5 days old and her foster parents wanted to adopt her.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
