|
|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases —
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case —
for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
|
| |
State Courts -
Connecticut - March 22, 2002
|
| |
Rubenstein & Sendy v. Cella, CV97595251,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, March 22, 2002, Decided , March 22, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
Stanley v. Stanley, FA010184873,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD-NORWALK, AT STAMFORD, March 22, 2002, Decided , March 22, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Husband was to pay periodic alimony pendente lite with due credit for any voluntary monthly payments to her as well as to pay an allowance for her attorney fees. Wife was to receive 30 percent of any bonuses.
|
|
| |
Swingle v. Watertown Zoning Bd. of Appeals, CV000158097,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, AT WATERBURY, March 22, 2002, Decided , March 22, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Because board was not competent to decide confiscation claims and trial court had inherent power to determine what evidence was necessary for equitable disposition of issues, additional evidence could be added to record.
|
|
| |
Tynik v. Redcoat Home Builders, X03CV980488994S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW BRITAIN, COMPLEX LITIGATION DOCKET AT NEW BRITAIN, March 22, 2002, Decided , March 22, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Town and inspector were not liable due to governmental immunity. There was no risk of harm to the home buyers, who did not cite a statute providing a private cause of action against building officials, and condition of premises was not unsafe.
|
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|
Worldwide
Feedback
Feedback