 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Berk v. Cyberian Outpost, CV 0003382773S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF DANBURY, AT DANBURY, May 1, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Plaintiff's employment did not terminate within initial term of his contract, rather, the employment terminated immediately following the expiration of the term of the employment agreement. Thus, plaintiff was not entitled to severance pay.
|
|||||
| City of Waterbury v. Town of Washington, X01UWYCV 970140886,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, AT WATERBURY, May 1, 2000, Decided , May 1, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Plaintiff did not establish by fair preponderance of evidence its claim of prescriptive easement against riparian rights of defendants; elements of proof of open and visible conduct for period of 15 years were not proven.
|
|||||
| Dakota F., [NO NUMBER IN ORIGINAL],
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX, AT MIDDLETOWN, JUVENILE MATTERS, CHILD PROTECTION SESSION, May 1, 2000, Decided , May 1, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Petition to terminate parental rights was granted. Court found by clear and convincing evidence that parents failed to rehabilitate and abandoned children. It was in children's best interests to terminate parental rights.
|
|||||
| Dognin v. Black, CV 990067320S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF ANSONIA - MILFORD, AT MILFORD, May 1, 2000, Decided , May 1, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's motion for summary judgment was granted, because in the absence of a formal marriage relationship at the time of the actionable conduct, a claim for loss of consortium could not be maintained.
|
|||||
| Ex rel. William R., [NO NUMBER IN ORIGINAL],
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX, AT MIDDLETOWN, JUVENILE MATTERS, CHILD PROTECTION SESSION, May 1, 2000, Decided , May 1, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Parental rights of mother and two fathers terminated for boys after placement in caring foster homes because parents failed to rehabilitate themselves as parents after the state made required reasonable provisions over three years for them to do so.
|
|||||
| Harvey v. Wilcox, FA 990118516,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NORWICH, May 1, 2000, Decided , May 1, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appeal was improper since stay of wage execution proceedings did not aggrieve appellant and was not final order; in any event, magistrate lacked jurisdiction to determine paternity in view of finding of paternity by default in another state.
|
|||||
| Hemingway v. Gem Chevrolet, CV 960062116,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TOLLAND, AT ROCKVILLE, May 1, 2000, Decided , May 1, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Lee v. Stlj, CV 970162038,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD - NORWALK, AT STAMFORD, May 1, 2000, Decided , May 1, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: After plaintiff alleged falling twice and used different dates of a fall on her complaint, issues of material fact regarding plaintiff's assertions remained to warrant the denial of defendant's motion for summary judgment.
|
|||||
| Lowe v. Durso, CV 99066799,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF ANSONIA - MILFORD, AT MILFORD, May 1, 2000, Decided , May 1, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court determined that it was more equitable to both parties to value both their monetary and non-monetary contributions in accordance with their agreement of joint equity, and confirmed its original award.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
