 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Ali v. Ali, 0554466S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NEW LONDON, February 9, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The court ordered that the parties marriage be dissolved, because the marriage was irretrievably broken down with no possibility of reconciliation; plaintiff claimed that defendant physically abused her, and that defendant was very possessive.
|
|||||
| American Sav. Bank v. Appletree, CV990594286,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, February 9, 2001, Decided , February 9, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: It would have been inequitable for bidder to lose entire deposit on property at foreclosure sale where notice was unclear and not completely read prior to sale, but court would allow evidence of expenses arising from bidder's negligence.
|
|||||
| Amity Regional Sch. Dist. No. 5 v. Atlas Constr. Co., X06CV990153388S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, COMPLEX LITIGATION DOCKET AT WATERBURY, February 9, 2001, Decided , February 9, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A school's attorney violated professional conduct rules. She tried to have an architect's report altered or withdrawn, and requested persons not to disclose the report. The report's contents were contrary to the school's litigation position.
|
|||||
| Beers v. Datahr Rehabilitation Inst., CV000339255S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF DANBURY, AT DANBURY, February 9, 2001, Decided , February 9, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Employee could not bring common law wrongful discharge claim regarding workers' compensation discrimination because statutory remedy was available. Employer's behavior did not qualify as intentional infliction of emotional distress.
|
|||||
| Braunstein v. Statewide Griev. Comm., CV990497398S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW BRITAIN AT NEW BRITAIN, February 9, 2001, Decided , February 9, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The court reversed and affirmed in part the disciplinary committee's findings that an attorney's representation of general partner and partnership, and his arranged loan to the partnership, were conflicts of interest, and remanded for sanctions.
|
|||||
| Carroll v. Wade, CV000082366S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF LITCHFIELD, AT LITCHFIELD, February 9, 2001, Decided , February 9, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: When asserting recklessness in a motor vehicle case, the party needed only to make the general allegations mentioned in the statute. The specificity of pleading required to support common law recklessness was not required.
|
|||||
| Clark v. Visiting Nurse Serv., CV000083003S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF LITCHFIELD, AT LITCHFIELD, February 9, 2001, Decided , February 9, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Execution of Connecticut statutory power of attorney by hurt patient authorized plaintiff to sue on her behalf; misnomer of plaintiff as guardian and next friend instead of attorney in fact could be corrected by amendment.
|
|||||
| Coyle v. Mackenzie, CV000339523S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF DANBURY, AT DANBURY, February 9, 2001, Decided , February 9, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendants waived their right to claim that the court lacked personal jurisdiction based on insufficient service of process, because defendants failed to file a motion to dismiss within 30 days of the entry of their appearance.
|
|||||
| Eaton v. GEICO Ins. Co., CV990334469S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF DANBURY, AT DANBURY, February 9, 2001, Decided , February 9, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The court granted defendant's motion to strike a claim alleging a violation of the Connecticut Unfair Insurance Practices Act, because plaintiff failed to allege facts indicating a general business practice on the part of defendant.
|
|||||
| In re Roselyn H., [NO NUMBER IN ORIGINAL],
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, AT WATERBURY, JUVENILE MATTERS, February 9, 2001, Decided , February 9, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court terminated both biological parents' parental rights where mother abandoned child, incarcerated father had no parent-child relationship with child, and termination of parental rights was in child's best interests.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
