 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Annex Young Men's Ass'n v. City of New Haven, CV030472728,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, February 14, 2003, Decided , February 14, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Although real property owner overcame presumption that city mailed revaluation notice to real property owner, the motion for temporary injunction was denied, as the city would not be able to appeal from it despite severe harm it might cause city.
|
|||||
| Beamon v. Hns Mgmt., CV020461904,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, February 14, 2003, Decided , February 14, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A city was granted its motion to strike a passenger's negligence claim stemming from an injury by means of an allegedly defective road because the passenger's exclusive remedy was Connecticut's highway defect statute.
|
|||||
| C.S.T.K. v. Bethel Planning & Zoning Comm'n, CV020344612S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF DANBURY, AT DANBURY, February 14, 2003, Decided , February 14, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Czahur v. Koeller, CV010456412S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, February 14, 2003, Decided , February 14, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Motion for summary judgment as to a single count that alleged negligence and intentional tort was denied because it was improper to grant summary judgment on an entire count that had more than one independent cause of action, one of which was viable.
|
|||||
| Del Valle v. Hartford Hosp., CV020815162S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD AT HARTFORD, February 14, 2003, Decided , February 14, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A parking lot manager was not entitled to summary judgment in a slip and fall case as there was an issue of fact as to whether the manager's negligent action in allowing a vehicle to block a pedestrian ramp was a proximate cause of the accident.
|
|||||
| Edwards v. Novartis Consumer Health, (X06)CV010167425S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, COMPLEX LITIGATION DOCKET AT WATERBURY, February 14, 2003, Decided , February 14, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Motion to strike civil conspiracy count was denied where trade association was not agent solely for manufacturers and distributors, but was acting on behalf of other constituent members; thus, intracorporate conspiracy doctrine was not applicable.
|
|||||
| Guimont v. Franckling, CV010811430S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, February 14, 2003, Decided , February 14, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a legal malpractice claim based on a lawyer's failure to file suit for injuries sustained by a client during course of employment, employer was not allowed to intervene to recover amounts paid to the client under the workers' compensation act.
|
|||||
| McCarter v. Smith, CV010076240S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TOLLAND, AT ROCKVILLE, February 14, 2003, Decided , February 14, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The car owner's motion for summary judgment was granted. The owner was not liable for the injuries to the injured party because his car was in the possession of an independent contractor, and he never spoke with the employee about driving the car.
|
|||||
| Mortgage Elec. Sys. v. Jazina, CV020172394,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, AT WATERBURY, February 14, 2003, Decided , February 14, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A debtor's motion to dismiss a creditor's foreclosure action was denied, because the motion to dismiss was filed out of time, as the debtor filed an answer and special defense prior to filing the motion to dismiss in violation of court rules.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
