 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| AFSCME, Council 4, Local 3144 v. City of New Haven, (AC 23347),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, February 17, 2004, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Exclusion of evidence that police officers had lied but had not been discharged did not deprive city employee discharged for lying on employment application full and fair arbitration hearing, as officers and employee had different responsibilities.
|
|||||
| Andrades v. Comm'r of Corr., (AC 23340),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, February 17, 2004, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Habeas court improperly denied inmate's petition for writ of habeas corpus and petition for certification to appeal the denial of the writ, as issues raised in the direct appeal were not the same claims the inmate asserted in the habeas petition.
|
|||||
| Colangelo v. Heckelman, CV010168331S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, AT WATERBURY, February 17, 2004, Decided , February 17, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where a car dealership technician subjected himself to the special hazards of the workplace by performing an inspection on a vehicle that was to be sold, an exception to the exclusivity of the workers' compensation act was not applicable.
|
|||||
| Daubert v. Borough of Naugatuck, (SC 16848),
SUPREME COURT OF CONNECTICUT, February 17, 2004, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellate court erred in ruling that a police officer was eligible for workers' compensation benefits; a commissioner properly found that the officer failed to show that an auto accident occurred while fulfilling the duties of employment.
|
|||||
| Granito v. IBM, X07CV020080440S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TOLLAND, COMPLEX LITIGATION DOCKET, AT TOLLAND, February 17, 2004, Decided , February 17, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Customer's motion for class certification in an action against a computer hard drive manufacturer was denied, as there would have to be individualized hearings to determine the issues of liability, causation, and damages as to each class member.
|
|||||
| Malanson v. Bridgeport Restoration Co., CV030482387S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, February 17, 2004, Decided , February 17, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A defendant's motion for medical authorizations in order to obtain imaging studies done of plaintiff, so that defendant could obtain an independent radiologist records review, was granted without condition; plaintiff was not entitled to that report.
|
|||||
| McGuire v. Travelers Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co., CV02079889,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF ANSONIA - MILFORD, AT MILFORD, February 17, 2004, Decided , February 17, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because there were no signatures by defendant or his attorney on his responses to plaintiff's request for admissions, defendant did not comply with Connecticut General Practice Book, and each matter unsigned matter was thus admitted.
|
|||||
| State v. Ankerman, (AC 23185),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, February 17, 2004, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant, an attorney, was properly convicted of larceny in the first degree by embezzlement where he wrote checks to himself out of a client's trust fund because, in part, his letter to a grievance committee admitting his overdraws was admissible.
|
|||||
| State v. Arrington, (AC 23438),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, February 17, 2004, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Denying defendant an opportunity to cross-examine the deceased victim's sister with respect to bias was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt as both she and another witness testified that defendant veered into the victim's lane causing the accident.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
