|
|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases —
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case —
for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more.
lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
|
| |
State Courts -
Connecticut - February 15, 2000
|
| |
Grieger v. Grieger, FA 980063242S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF ANSONIA - MILFORD, AT MILFORD, February 15, 2000, Decided , February 15, 2000, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Petitioner's motion for dissolution of marriage was granted without the court assigning blame, as it was a contested issue. The court made a division of property to each party.
|
|
| |
Kull v. Town of Greenwich Inlands/Wetlands & Watercourses Agency, CV 990170583S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD - NORWALK, AT STAMFORD, February 15, 2000, Decided , February 15, 2000, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Agency did not err by granting permit to build home near wetlands area, since construction would not impact area; also, plaintiff lacked standing to appeal agency's ruling, since plaintiff failed to show he was aggrieved.
|
|
| |
Kupchunos v. Freedom of Info. Comm'n, CV 990496002S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD - NEW BRITAIN, AT NEW BRITAIN, February 15, 2000, Decided , February 15, 2000, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Because commission failed to find that high sheriff had custody and control over requested payroll and personnel records, it could not determine that sheriff violated freedom of information act by not producing the records.
|
|
| |
Lazrove v. Lazrove, FA 960389467,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, February 15, 2000, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Motion to reargue a modification to decree regarding alimony denied because motion not timely, income was reported properly, court credited defendant's testimony, court's decision was complete, and statute properly applied.
|
|
| |
Lowe v. Rinaldi, CV 9867973S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TOLLAND, AT ROCKVILLE, February 15, 2000, Decided , February 15, 2000, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Judgment for plaintiff and against defendant individual for personal injury damages. Judgment entered for all other defendants, because there was insufficient evidence to support plaintiff's complaint.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Metropolitan Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co. v. Miller, CV 990494141S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD - NEW BRITAIN, AT NEW BRITAIN, February 15, 2000, Decided , February 15, 2000, Filed
View this case - free
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
New Britain Gen. Hosp. v. Lafferty, CV 990494659S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD - NEW BRITAIN, AT NEW BRITAIN, February 15, 2000, Decided , February 15, 2000, Filed
View this case - free
|
|
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|
