Connecticut, February, 2004, State Case law

Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

State Courts - Connecticut - February 17, 2004

State v. Valle, (AC 23348), APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, February 17, 2004, Officially Released
View this case - free

Overview: Defendant's convictions of sale of a hallucinogenic substance and conspiracy to sell a hallucinogenic substance were affirmed, because the trial court did not err in instructing the jury on the issue of accessory liability.

Search Cases for Free

Swerdloff v. Rubenstein, (AC 24033), APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, February 17, 2004, Officially Released
View this case - free

Overview: Because a former client did not request a trial court's articulation as to its rationale for denying a continuance where his former attorneys sought fees, there was an inadequate basis on which to review the claim of abuse of discretion.

Search Cases for Free

Terra Techs. Group v. E. Hartford Planning & Zoning Comm'n, CV010803723S, CV010809093S, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, February 17, 2004, Decided , February 17, 2004, Filed
View this case - free

Overview: Although some reasons given for twice denying a subdivision application were inappropriate, denial was proper based on failure to comply with regulations concerning access, lot configuration, and road width.

Search Cases for Free

Vaillancourt v. Latifi, (AC 23942), APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, February 17, 2004, Officially Released
View this case - free

Overview: An athletic club did not owe the injured party a duty of care, as nothing alleged in the complaint constituted the proximate cause of his injury where he was injured during a softball game as a result of another player running into him.

Search Cases for Free

Wentland v. Am. Equity Ins. Co., (SC 16802), SUPREME COURT OF CONNECTICUT, February 17, 2004, Officially Released
View this case - free

Overview: Trial court erred in granting summary judgment to an insurer in a declaratory judgment action concerning the duty to defend insureds; under the circumstances of the underlying actions, a liquor liability policy exclusion did not apply.

Search Cases for Free

Communities Portal