 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Bonelli v. Giguere, CV020819257S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, February 18, 2004, Decided , February 18, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where a motor vehicle accident occurred in Connecticut, it was determined in a conflicts of laws analysis that Connecticut law controlled, as it had the most significant contacts; accordingly, a New York seatbelt law was inapplicable.
|
|||||
| Frank v. Warden, State Prison, CV010805097,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TOLLAND, February 18, 2004, Decided , February 18, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: An inmate's habeas corpus petition was denied as there was no evidence of ineffective counsel based on his guilty plea to manslaughter. Also, there was no prejudice as it was extremely likely he would have been found guilty of murder at a trial.
|
|||||
| Gonzalez v. Sackett, CV020174484S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, AT WATERBURY, February 18, 2004, Decided , February 18, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A court granted a motorist's motion to strike an indemnity claim against it by a driver, arising from a multi-vehicle accident; the court declined to extend indemnification to such accidents.
|
|||||
| Lutter v. Kay, CV000161393S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, AT WATERBURY, February 18, 2004, Decided , February 18, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where a plaintiff's initial offer of judgment was never transmitted to defendants, her attorney's realization and immediate fax of the offer to them months later was without his client's authorization and was an invalid offer of judgment.
|
|||||
| Maples Rest., Inc. v. Crossroads W., LLC, CV020172606S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, AT WATERBURY, February 18, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Contractor's motion to strike plaintiff's cause of action for strict liability was denied because blasting was an inherently dangerous activity, and plaintiff alleged a chain of contracts that linked the contractor with the blaster.
|
|||||
| Masonicare Corp. v. Marsh USA, CV030821900,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, February 18, 2004, Decided , February 18, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where business owners alleged that an insurance agent misrepresented the extent of their business coverage and that they relied thereon, their pleadings were sufficient to defeat the agent's motion to strike; due diligence did not have to be pled.
|
|||||
| Mownn v. Mownn, FA940317633S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF DANBURY, AT DANBURY, February 18, 2004, Decided , February 18, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Imputation of income to a former husband was clearly erroneous, where he was before the court and testified as to his odd jobs, and accordingly, the circumstances did not merit the imputation of income in a child support modification proceeding.
|
|||||
| Nat'l Elec. Coil, Inc. v. Schilberg Integrated Metals Corp., CV020818366S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, February 18, 2004, Decided , February 18, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: As plaintiffs sufficiently alleged conversion and civil theft and claimed damages resulting therefrom, they stated substantial aggravating circumstances under "cigarette rule"; court therefore would not strike their unfair trade practices act claim.
|
|||||
| Pierce v. Verzillo, CV03082001,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF ANSONIA - MILFORD, AT MILFORD, February 18, 2004, Decided , February 18, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In suit for accident involving statutory claim against State for damages alleging that its trooper caused the accident, trial court granted motion to strike State's sovereign immunity special defense; State did not file brief opposing motion.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
