|
|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases —
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case —
for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
|
| |
State Courts -
Connecticut - February 15, 2005
|
| |
Amati v. Amati, FA030403606S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, February 15, 2005, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Where the husband's income from his job, $ 449 per week, was greater than the wife's employment-related income, $ 175 per week, and where the wife was awarded custody of the parties' two children, the husband was required to pay the wife $ 146 per week in child support and $ 100 per week in alimony.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Ameriquest Mortg. Co. v. Umpierre, CV040286405S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT MERIDEN, February 15, 2005, Decided , February 15, 2005, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Since a finding of actual notice could be inferred from the marshal's return of service which reflected in-hand service on the subsequent encumbrancer's registered agent, the presumed finding of actual notice obviated the need to grant a continuance pursuant to Conn. Gen. Stat. ? 52-87. Thus, the motion to reopen the foreclosure was denied.
|
|
| |
|
| |
City of Waterbury v. Local 353, AFSCME Council 4, CV000161560S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, AT WATERBURY, February 15, 2005, Decided , February 15, 2005, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: City's motion to vacate an arbitration board's decision that answered an unrestricted submission tendered by the city and the union, pursuant to the CBA and Conn. Gen. Stat. ? 52-418, was denied because the board's award finding that the city violated the CBA conformed to the submission and the court could not further review the matter.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Didsbury v. Allstate Ins. Co., CV040092536S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF LITCHFIELD, AT LITCHFIELD, February 15, 2005, Decided , February 15, 2005, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Insurer's summary judgment motion in an action for uninsured motorist benefits was granted; although the limitations period was tolled by the insolvency of the tortfeasor's insurer pursuant to Conn. Gen. Stat. ? 38a-336(g)(2), the policy holder failed to file the instant action within one year of learning of the insolvency.
|
|
| |
Dontigney v. Dontigney, FA030285366S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT MERIDEN, February 15, 2005, Decided , February 15, 2005, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Parties' marriage was dissolved as irretrievably broken; wife kept "equity" gift made to her regarding purchase of family home, and husband kept money gift given to him by his father so that he could purchase a condominium when the parties separated.
|
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|
Worldwide
Feedback
Feedback