 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| In re Messiah J., [NO NUMBER IN ORIGINAL],
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD - NEW BRITAIN, AT HARTFORD, JUVENILE MATTERS, May 2, 2000, Decided , May 2, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Having considered all statutory considerations, court found, by clear and convincing evidence, grounds to support termination of mother's parental rights and that child's best interest would be served.
|
|||||
| Lecy v. City of New London, 549544,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NEW LONDON, May 2, 2000, Decided , May 2, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Governmental immunity did not bar negligence claim by high school student against city and school board, arising out of attack by another student on school grounds, since there was no statute giving immunity to defendants.
|
|||||
| McCarthy v. McCarthy, FA 930114862S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, AT WATERBURY, May 2, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The fact that the minor may have completed high school prior to her 18th birthday did not relieve defendant of the obligation to pay child support until the completion of her 18th birthday.
|
|||||
| McGee v. Hartford, CV 990359979S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, May 2, 2000, Decided , May 2, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Plaintiff's motion for arbitration was granted because her action against the defendant had not gone to trial, no extensive discovery had been done, and defendant was not prejudiced by allowing the dispute to go to arbitration.
|
|||||
| Mercantile Bank v. Hurowitz, CV 950381091S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, May 2, 2000, Decided , May 2, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In foreclosure suit, defenses and counterclaim alleging that lienholder failed to comply with a stipulation made as a result of a prior foreclosure suit were stricken because they attacked a procedure of the lienholder, not the note itself.
|
|||||
| O'Malley v. O'Malley, FA 980167647S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD - NORWALK, AT STAMFORD, May 2, 2000, Decided , May 2, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The court ordered custody and visitation in reference to the parties stipulation, ordered defendant to pay to the plaintiff periodic alimony, and divided the marital property and debts.
|
|||||
| Piatto, Inc. v. Mack, CV 9900175445S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD - NORWALK, AT STAMFORD, May 2, 2000, Decided , May 2, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Pinto v. Lopez, CV 000069150S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF ANSONIA - MILFORD, AT MILFORD, May 2, 2000, Decided , May 2, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Raboin v. North Am. Indus., (AC 19021),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, May 2, 2000, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Summary judgment was improper, as a genuine issue of material fact existed as to whether building owner's inspection of premises was reasonable given owner's assumption of control over premises where plaintiff was working.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
