 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Killie v. Martin, CV010086281S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF LITCHFIELD, AT LITCHFIELD, February 18, 2003, Decided , February 18, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A creditor who alleged with particularity that a debtor owed him money and that the debtor acquired properties and placed them in his wife's name for the purpose of defrauding creditors stated a sufficient complaint for fraudulent transfer.
|
|||||
| Larocque v. Percoski, CV970063927S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TOLLAND, AT ROCKVILLE, February 18, 2003, Decided , February 18, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Possessors who paid the grantor for land the grantor believed she owned exclusively, and received a deed in return, and openly occupied the property for a quarter century established adverse possession by clear and convincing evidence.
|
|||||
| Lee v. Brave Indus., CV000378016,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, February 18, 2003, Decided , February 18, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Owner's control over the circumstances in which injured person used a log splitter did not equate to exclusive control of condition that caused the injury. Third party indemnity complaint filed by defendant in products liability case was stricken.
|
|||||
| Local 353, AFSCME, Council 4 v. City of Waterbury, (AC 22166),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, February 18, 2003, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A union sought to vacate an arbitration award, The trial court's memorandum of decision addressed the arguments raised in the appeal, and it was adopted as a proper statement of the issues and law. The judgment of the trial court was affirmed.
|
|||||
| Mock v. Warden, CV000003127,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TOLLAND, GEOGRAPHICAL AREA 19, AT ROCKVILLE, February 18, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: An inmate who was no longer confined due to his convictions, but who was on probation, could file a petition for habeas corpus relief; accordingly, a prison warden's motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction was denied.
|
|||||
| Phoenix Ins. Co. v. Teledyne Laars, CV990592016S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, February 18, 2003, Decided , February 18, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In subrogation action, damages award to insurer was upheld where jury charge permitted it to decide whether insurer had policy with insured and paid damages under it, and there was no evidence to indicate jury exceeded authority in reaching verdict.
|
|||||
| Raymond v. Freedom of Info. Comm'n, (AC 20400),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, February 18, 2003, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: There was no substantial justification for Freedom of Information Commission (FIC) to ignore fact that plaintiff's complaint had been received within 30 days when the complaint was received on the next business day after the FIC office was closed.
|
|||||
| Rocheleau v. Nursing Servs., CV000598529,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, February 18, 2003, Decided , February 18, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where a genuine issue of material fact existed concerning whether the employer's records were true and accurate statements of the overtime hours worked by the employee, the employer was not entitled to summary judgment.
|
|||||
| S. New Eng. Tel. Co. v. F. Woodward Lewis, Jr., P.C., CV980408723S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, February 18, 2003, Decided , February 18, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Phone company's summary judgment motion was denied as to the phone company's claims for breach of contract and unjust enrichment against its client, and the client's counterclaims were permitted except for his invasion of privacy counterclaim.
|
|||||
| State v. Arluk, (AC 22246),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, February 18, 2003, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The trial court properly admitted a statement by defendant's child as a spontaneous utterance during defendant's trial for assault and other charges, because the child was still under the stress of the event when he made the statement.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
