Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

   State Courts - Connecticut - February 18, 2004

  
Schultz v. Berkowsky, CV020188608S, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD-NORWALK AT STAMFORD, February 18, 2004, Decided , February 18, 2004, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Judgment was entered in favor of neighbors in property owners' action seeking title to a strip of land pursuant to adverse possession; the owners failed to show that they had adversely possessed the land for the required period of time.

Search Cases for Free

  
State v. Brown, CR0284500T, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WINDHAM, GEOGRAPHICAL AREA 11 AT DANIELSON, February 18, 2004, Decided , February 18, 2004, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: At some point within a missing child matrix, emergency circumstances and developments clearly outweighed defendant's expectations, if any, of privacy. Thus, all evidence found at the scene of the discovery of the child's body was admissible.

Search Cases for Free

  
State v. Ortiz, CR020557413, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, February 18, 2004, Decided , February 18, 2004, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Defendant's motion to suppress evidence was denied because entry into a bathroom in defendant's apartment by police was justified under the emergency doctrine, as the police were responding to a burglar alarm in the apartment.

Search Cases for Free

  
Timpe v. Timpe, FA020563825, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NORWICH, February 18, 2004, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free

  
Werner v. Richardson, CV020819120, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, February 18, 2004, Decided , February 18, 2004, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Where an enforceable contract was found in a joint venture for operation of a jewelry store by the parties, there could be no award for unjust enrichment, which was an equitable remedy where no contract was found.

Search Cases for Free

  
Back to Top