|
|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases —
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case —
for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more.
lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
|
| |
State Courts -
Connecticut - April 24, 2000
|
| |
Ameripride Linen Serv. v. Giguere, CV 990497332S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD - NEW BRITAIN, AT NEW BRITAIN, April 24, 2000, Decided , April 24, 2000, Filed
View this case - free
|
|
|
| |
Berry v. Shearin, CV 950321443S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, April 24, 2000, Decided , April 24, 2000, Filed
View this case - free
|
|
|
| |
Bibace v. Schmickler, CV 990173767S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD - NORWALK, AT STAMFORD, April 24, 2000, Decided , April 24, 2000, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Defendant's motion to dismiss was denied because service of process was not insufficient under Conn. Gen. Stat. ¿ 52-59b(c); defendant failed to provide any evidence to rebut his testimony from a prior proceeding that his attorney's address was his last known address.
|
|
| |
Chase Mortg. Co. v. Infurchia, CV 990364821S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, April 24, 2000, Decided , April 24, 2000, Filed
View this case - free
|
|
|
| |
Connecticut Light & Power Co. v. Jeg Holdings, CV 000499585S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD - NEW BRITAIN, AT NEW BRITAIN, April 24, 2000, Decided , April 24, 2000, Filed
View this case - free
|
|
|
| |
Connecticut Resources Recovery Auth. v. Department of Pub. Util. Control, CV 990493967S, CV 990493968S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD - NEW BRITAIN, AT NEW BRITAIN, April 24, 2000, Decided , April 24, 2000, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Plaintiffs' appeal of agency decision authorizing auction of purchase power agreements which defendant, an public service electric company, entered into with private providers was dismissed for lack of standing.
|
|
| |
|
| |
Davidi v. Schindler Elevator Corp., CV 980169160S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD - NORWALK, AT STAMFORD, April 24, 2000, Decided , April 24, 2000, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Cross-claims which did not arise out of the same transaction as plaintiff's claims, and which would require evidence not connected to plaintiff's claim, were barred by "transaction test."
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|
