 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Borer v. Mirabilio, CV 980415902S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, February 17, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Insurer's objection to motion to implead was sustained because "emotional distress" absent any physical manifestation, did not constitute "bodily harm" in its plain and ordinary meaning, and did not fall within policy terms.
|
|||||
| Bryer v. Scott, CV 9970687S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TOLLAND, AT ROCKVILLE, February 17, 2000, Decided , February 17, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant, in a sexual assault action, was prevented from asserting a counterclaim of vexatious litigation where he had failed to allege that the underlying litigation had terminated in his favor.
|
|||||
| City of Norwalk v. Dinardo, CV 990171708S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD - NORWALK, AT STAMFORD, February 17, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Plaintiff City's motion for summary judgment was denied because a genuine issue of material fact remained as to whether the tax liens remained due and outstanding from the defendants.
|
|||||
| Derosa v. Southington Planning & Zoning Comm'n, CV 990494345S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD - NEW BRITAIN, AT NEW BRITAIN, February 17, 2000, Decided , February 17, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant zoning commission's denial of application to resubdivide plaintiffs' property improper, because record did not contain substantial evidence supporting finding that creation of rear lot would not be best use of land.
|
|||||
| Giuliani v. Unifirst Corp., CV 970480452S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD - NEW BRITAIN, AT NEW BRITAIN, February 17, 2000, Decided , February 17, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Indemnification clause in rental agreement did not absolve defendant uniform supplier's liability for burns suffered by employee of defendant employer if supplier made oral representations regarding uniform's suitability.
|
|||||
| In re Amanda M., [NO NUMBER IN ORIGINAL],
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUVENILE MATTERS, February 17, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Ravalese v. Vaughan, CV 990591918,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD - NEW BRITAIN, AT HARTFORD, February 17, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| State v. "bo" Gritz, CR 96103069,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD - NEW BRITAIN, AT HARTFORD, February 17, 2000, Decided , February 17, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In criminal case, motion to quash subpoena that was served upon the State's attorney was granted when defendant could not show a compelling need for the State's attorney's testimony.
|
|||||
| Triano v. Fitzpatrick, CV 000494828,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD - NEW BRITAIN, AT NEW BRITAIN, February 17, 2000, Decided , February 17, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Plaintiff patient, alleging that defendant physician operated on the wrong eye without consent, sufficiently alleged facts to support conclusion that defendant physician's conduct was knowingly wanton or reckless.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
