 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Doran v. Doran, FA940543368,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, February 14, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Plaintiff husband's alimony obligation would not be terminated despite defendant wife's six-month cohabitation with a member of the opposite sex, because defendant had reaped no financial benefits from the arrangement.
|
|||||
| Forlano v. Ho, CV000444335,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN AT NEW HAVEN, February 14, 2001, Decided , February 14, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Injured's negligence action against driver and owner of vehicle was dismissed for lack of personal jurisdiction due to insufficient service of process. Canadian driver should have been served with process under international convention.
|
|||||
| Hicks v. Eburg, FA860021233S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF ANSONIA - MILFORD, AT MILFORD, February 14, 2001, Decided , February 14, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Order to pay child support arrearages was reversed and remanded as the magistrate failed to determine the amount of support indicated by the child support guidelines, and to articulate the reason for deviating from the guidelines.
|
|||||
| Hixon v. Eilers, CV990592937S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, February 14, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court granted motion to dismiss negligent and intention infliction of emotional distress claims after defendants cut down their neighbors' trees and shrubs; the injury was only to property, and the conduct was not extreme and outrageous.
|
|||||
| Keane v. Healy Ford Lincoln Mercury, CV000071501S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF ANSONIA - MILFORD, AT DERBY, February 14, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where an individual was not a party to an agreement that contained an arbitration clause and corporation had not indicated that it was ready and willing to arbitrate, the motion to stay proceedings because of the arbitration clause was denied.
|
|||||
| Mourning v. Warden, State Prison, CV960002281S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TOLLAND, AT ROCKVILLE, February 14, 2001, Decided , February 14, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Warden properly filed motion for summary judgment in petitioner's habeas corpus proceeding, because Connecticut General Practice Book section used permitted any party to move for summary judgment at any time after pleadings were closed.
|
|||||
| Sakr v. Begler, FA98353482S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, February 14, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Sakr v. Begler, FA98353482S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, February 14, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where father's income had decreased since the dissolution of the parties' marriage, the court recalculated his child support obligation and decreased his obligation.
|
|||||
| State v. Barksdale, CR990150061,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, February 14, 2001, Decided , February 14, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The court granted the State's motion to substitute a judge in a criminal proceeding, due to the illness of the first trial judge, after the jury had reached a guilty verdict, to rule on defendant's outstanding motions and to sentence defendant.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
