 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Beasley-Murray v. Beasley-Murray, FA970399884S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, February 13, 2002, Decided , February 13, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Father's motion for modification of unallocated alimony and child support was denied where father made little effort to find full-time work, and, thus, failed to prove substantial downward change in his earning capacity since date of divorce.
|
|||||
| Calash v. Griffin, CV00070523,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF ANSONIA - MILFORD, AT MILFORD, February 13, 2002, Decided , February 13, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where injured party sued driver in Connecticut for personal injuries and then moved to Arizona, trial court sustained injured party's objection to driver's request for injured party to submit to physical examination in Connecticut.
|
|||||
| Correa v. Ragozine, CV000443038S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, February 13, 2002, Decided , February 13, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Passenger was not covered under insurance policy held by man living with mother because such arrangement did not make passenger family member covered under insurance policy.
|
|||||
| Drew v. Drew, FA010181713S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD-NORWALK, AT STAMFORD, February 13, 2002, Decided , February 13, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court dissolved parties' marriage, adopted custody, visitation, and property division stipulations, and entered orders regarding, inter alia, alimony, child support, and division of remaining marital property.
|
|||||
| Estate of Gerard Weitzman v. Estate of Ribeiro, CV000092739S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX, AT MIDDLETOWN, February 13, 2002, Decided , February 13, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Request to revise was not ordinarily to be used to test substantial rights in lieu of demurrer, but such motion was proper to attack an amended complaint after demurrer was sustained where allegations appeared to be same as those stricken.
|
|||||
| Fusco v. Fusco, FA850241449S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, February 13, 2002, Decided , February 13, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Father's motion to modify post-majority child support order was dismissed, as trial court lacked jurisdiction to modify the post-majority support order absent a written agreement giving it power to modify that order.
|
|||||
| Gallant v. Housatonic Lumber Co., CV01074167,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF ANSONIA - MILFORD, AT MILFORD, February 13, 2002, Decided , February 13, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Facts of negligence claim presented proper case for summary judgment on issue of liability. Treble damage statute for cutting of trees was inapplicable where defendant mistakenly destroyed tree.
|
|||||
| Gambuccini v. Miller Agency, CV000070851S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF ANSONIA - MILFORD, AT MILFORD, February 13, 2002, Decided , February 13, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Summary judgment was granted as there was no evidence to show agency relationship with regard to motorist's auto policy, nor was there evidence that insurance company was fiduciary to motorist generally with regard to her insurance needs.
|
|||||
| Gates v. Budget Rent-A-Car, CV980411351S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, February 13, 2002, Decided , February 13, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Motion for summary judgment was granted where there were no genuine issues of material fact in existence. As matter of law, any alleged injury to driver was not caused by uninsured or underinsured motor vehicle.
|
|||||
| Packer v. Packer, FA010185251S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD-NORWALK, AT STAMFORD, February 13, 2002, Decided , February 13, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where wife's earning capacity at least equaled husband's, wife was not entitled to alimony. Based on guidelines, husband was ordered to pay $ 266 weekly to wife as child support and 39 percent of any unreimbursed medical expenses.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
