 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Bertini v. New Haven Bd. of Zoning Appeals, CV020468557S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, February 19, 2003, Decided , February 19, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Record did not support board of zoning appeals' judgment that denying variance to setback ordinance would create hardship for homeowner who wanted to build second story on house, and court sustained abutting owner's challenge to board's decision.
|
|||||
| Carney v. Fed. Express Corp., CV020467894,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, February 19, 2003, Decided , February 19, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In injured party and mother's action against a motorist, trial court denied mother's motion to strike special defense of inadequate parental supervision, but granted motion to strike motorist's special defense alleging failure to state valid claim.
|
|||||
| Caruso v. Caruso, CV020465379,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, February 19, 2003, Decided , February 19, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A trial court had subject matter jurisdiction over an action seeking partition by sale of real property that was held by tenants in common, even though the grantor still had a reserved life use in the property.
|
|||||
| City Of New Haven ex rel. New Haven Bd. of Educ. v. Spose, CV010456998S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, February 19, 2003, Decided , February 19, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The condemnation award to the property owners was inadequate where the city's appraiser valued two floors of one of the parcels as storage space rather than residential space. Interest at rate of eight percent per annum was equitable.
|
|||||
| Davis v. Canavan, CV990427765,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, February 19, 2003, Decided , February 19, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Subcontractor was not entitled to summary judgment on firefighter's negligence claim since whether cover for stairway hole was reasonably safe and whether temporary guardrails should have also been constructed and installed were questions of fact.
|
|||||
| Day v. Warden, CV010003455,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TOLLAND, GEOGRAPHICAL AREA 19 AT ROCKVILLE, February 19, 2003, Decided , February 19, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A petition for a writ of habeas corpus was denied because petitioner received effective representation from both his trial defense counsel and his appellate defense counsel.
|
|||||
| Fitzpatrick Elec. v. L&S Monroe Rest. Mgmt., CV020392071S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, February 19, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Contractor's motion to strike a company's special defense and counterclaim in relation to an action to foreclose a mechanic's lien was denied; unclean hands could be asserted as a special defense, and the CUTPA counterclaim was adequate.
|
|||||
| Hillis v. Hillis, FA000179465S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD-NORWALK AT STAMFORD, February 19, 2003, Decided , February 19, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: For purposes of alimony under an agreement, gross income did not include husband's withdrawals from a pension account, where he had retained the account as his share of marital property, and asset grew by post decree contributions and appreciation.
|
|||||
| Lergos v. Lergos, FA020729183,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, February 19, 2003, Decided , February 19, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In divorce action, husband was ordered to pay weekly alimony of $ 100 for 12 years, wife was to retain interest in shopping center and Greek property, and wife was ordered to convey interest in home to husband in exchange for mortgage of $ 75,000.
|
|||||
| Pri Capital Funding, LLC v. E. Capital Funding, LLC, CV010559410S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NEW LONDON, February 19, 2003, Decided , February 19, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Indian tribe was not necessary party to plaintiff's tortious interference claim, as it had not been alleged to have engaged in tortious interference; defendants' motion to strike was denied as to all claims in which defendants advanced this argument.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
