 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Adil v. Adil, FA040735712,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, February 16, 2005, Decided , February 16, 2005, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where a wife sought dissolution of her marriage to her husband, it was found that all of the allegations of her complaint were proven and that the marriage of the parties had broken down irretrievably. The marriage was ordered dissolved for those reasons.
|
|||||
| Cayer v. W. Conn. State Univ., CV044001958S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, February 16, 2005, Decided , February 16, 2005, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: State employee's constructive discharge claim against his employer survived a motion to strike. However, claims based on Conn. Gen. Stat. ¿ 46a-54(17) and Conn. Const. art. 1, ¿ 8, as to the employer's sovereign immunity were considered abandoned and thus were stricken.
|
|||||
| Esposito v. Karaoke, Inc., CV030521042,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW BRITAIN AT NEW BRITAIN, February 16, 2005, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Motion for summary judgment filed by the restaurant and the permittee was denied because the court determined that tavern owner liability imposed for the first time in 2003 by the Connecticut Supreme Court could be applied retroactively to the motor vehicle accident at issue in the lawsuit.
|
|||||
| Frankowski v. Mancivilano, CV044001618,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, February 16, 2005, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Plaintiff's request to vacate the dismissal of a case due to plaintiff's failure to comply with Conn. Gen. Stat. ¿ 52-46a was denied where nowhere had plaintiff cited any authority for her claim that pleadings filed after a proper motion to dismiss in any way negated a movant's right to pursue a dismissal for lack of personal jurisdiction.
|
|||||
| Grzesiak v. Town of Brooklyn Zoning Bd. of Appeals, CV030071156S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WINDHAM, AT PUTNAM, February 16, 2005, Decided , February 16, 2005, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where applicant sought variance for property in order to build single-family home because topography of lot required engineered septic system for which zoning laws imposed larger lot size, variance was consistent with Conn. Gen. Stat. ¿ 8-6(a)(3). Variance had health department approval and was to improve circumstances of lot and neighborhood.
|
|||||
| Halligan v. Halligan, FA910387887S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, February 16, 2005, Decided , February 16, 2005, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Husband's motion to find the wife in contempt on grounds she violated a provision in their dissolution agreement to help select their daughter's college was denied as the husband failed to present evidence that said section was violated. The court ordered the parties to provide input to the daughter, allowing her to make the final decision.
|
|||||
| In re Nelmarie O., H12CP03009343, H12CP03009344,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, JUVENILE MATTERS AT HARTFORD, February 16, 2005, Decided , February 16, 2005, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The parents failed to fulfil their parental responsibilities as to their two surviving children. The Department of Children and Families proved sufficient grounds to terminate the parental rights of the father and mother pursuant to Conn. Gen. Stat. 17a-112 where they abused the brother of the two children and he eventually was killed.
|
|||||
| In re Noah B., CP00013544A,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX, CHILD PROTECTION SESSION AT MIDDLETOWN, February 16, 2005, Decided , February 16, 2005, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Termination of father's parental rights was ordered where evidence clearly and convincingly established that the father did not satisfy commonly understood obligations of parenthood and, thus, had abandoned his four-year-old son under Conn. Gen. Stat. ¿ 17a-112(j)(3)(A) and where evidence showed that termination was in the best interest of the son.
|
|||||
| Juliano v. Juliano, FA010447776S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, February 16, 2005, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a divorce action, the court granted a husband's motion to reargue the issue of payment of the wife's attorney fees and vacated all postjudgment orders related to attorney fees and the husband's purported contempt because there was confusion in the proceedings relating to those two issues.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
