|
|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases —
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case —
for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
|
| |
State Courts -
Connecticut - February 17, 2006
|
| |
Anderson v. Grant, CV055000208S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT MERIDEN, February 17, 2006, Decided , February 17, 2006, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: In an action arising from a dog attack, an injured party's motion seeking prejudgment remedy, pursuant to Conn. Gen. Stat. ? 52-278 et seq., against certain real property was granted, as the injured party provided probable cause to believe that the property owner was the keeper of the dog in question.
|
|
| |
|
| |
Coriano v. Menhennett, CV054007629,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, February 17, 2006, Decided , February 17, 2006, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Summary judgment barred a second negligence suit filed under the accidental failure of suit statute, Conn. Gen. Stat. ??52-592, due to the injured party's failure to comply with discovery requests, as dismissal of a prior suit was not "for matter of form" and could not be salvaged by the injured party's mistake, inadvertence, or excusable neglect.
|
|
| |
Estate of Sara O'Connor v. O'Connor, (X10)CV054010375(CLD),
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, February 17, 2006, Decided , February 17, 2006, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Court did not reexamine present state of common law regarding the existence of a parent-child privilege in a case where a mother allegedly shot and killed her seven-year-old daughter because the mother waived any privilege that might exist with respect to e-mail communications between herself and the decedent's grandmother.
|
|
| |
|
| |
Hamm v. Estes, HHBCV054004909S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW BRITAIN AT NEW BRITAIN, February 17, 2006, Decided , February 17, 2006, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Since a city employee had not alleged that judgment had been obtained against him in regard to a business owner's negligence action, the employee's claim for indemnification against the city under Conn. Gen. Stat. ? 7-465 was legally insufficient.
|
|
| |
|
| |
Jennings v. Summitwood, LLC, CV044000393,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX, AT MIDDLETOWN, February 17, 2006, Decided , February 17, 2006, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Defendants breached a subcontract, as they stopped work on a water line before the subcontractor could finish the work; however, the subcontractor was negligent in installing the line, as the work was inordinately slow and the pipe was allowed to become contaminated with dirt and water.
|
|
| |
Lane v. Noce, CV044001112S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF ANSONIA - MILFORD, AT MILFORD, February 17, 2006, Decided , February 17, 2006, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Because a client's legal malpractice action was filed well over three years from the act or omission alleged to be the basis for the same, contrary to the requirements of Conn. Gen. Stat. ? 52-577, and the continuous representation doctrine did not apply, summary judgment was entered against the client and in favor of his attorney.
|
|
| |
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|
Worldwide
Feedback
Feedback