Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free! Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free! While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
	State Courts - Connecticut - May 1, 2000
	Mooney v. Sear, CV 950146994, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD - NORWALK, AT STAMFORD, May 1, 2000, Decided , May 1, 2000, Filed View this case - free   Overview: Defendant was granted summary judgment in plaintiff's malicious prosecution case against her after he was arrested for slapping his daughter, as evidence failed to show defendant initiated the arrest. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Vissa v. Pagano, CV 980168124S, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD - NORWALK, AT STAMFORD, May 1, 2000, Filed View this case - free   Overview: The pleadings provided sufficient notice of the unjust enrichment claim, and the court was not required to apply the tort statute of limitations to an equitable proceeding for unjust enrichment. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Waterbury Hotel Equity v. City of Waterbury, CV 970140410S, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, AT WATERBURY, May 1, 2000, Decided , May 1, 2000, Filed View this case - free   Overview: There was a question of fact as to whether original evaluation was in error, and therefore, would not apply to the property valuation for years which followed 1990; this claim could not be collaterally estopped. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Back to Top
	www.lexisnexis.com  |  About LexisNexis  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Customer Support  |  Contact Us   Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.