Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

   State Courts - Connecticut - February 19, 2003

  
Sherman v. Statewide Griev. Comm., CV020513693S, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, February 19, 2003, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free

  
State v. Schiavo, CR00288078, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, AT WATERBURY, February 19, 2003, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Defendant's new trial petition alleging discovery violation due to correctional facility's seizure of defendant's letter, commented on at sentencing, related to no factual issues during trial's guilt phase and presented no basis to grant petition.

Search Cases for Free

  
Stock v. Andrews, CV010095918S, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX, AT MIDDLETOWN, February 19, 2003, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Where town's roadway was not located on area designated in subdivision plans, land was deemed abandoned by town, and title was quieted to each owner on their side of center line; town had easement where road did run.

Search Cases for Free

  
Williams v. Williams, FA010446310, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, February 19, 2003, Decided , February 19, 2003, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: In a dissolution of marriage proceeding, the court granted the dissolution, ordered that no child support or alimony be paid by either party, and divided the property between the parties.

Search Cases for Free

  
Wilson v. R&C Serv. Co., CV990081115S, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF LITCHFIELD, AT LITCHFIELD, February 19, 2003, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: When an employee recovered in a third-party action, expenditures were deducted, then the employer's claim, with the remainder distributed to the employee. Comparative negligence did not apply to the employer's right to recover workers' compensation.

Search Cases for Free

  
Back to Top