|
|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases —
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case —
for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
|
| |
State Courts -
Connecticut - February 19, 2004
|
| |
Annual Conf. of the Unison Free Will Baptist Church v. St. Luke Unison Free Will Baptist Church, CV02395559S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, February 19, 2004, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Where a reverend's license to practice had been suspended by the religious society conference that had issued the license, his continued service created harm, and therefore standing, to the conference and the reverend that issued the suspension.
|
|
| |
Bostic v. Am. Zurich Ins., CV030083542S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF ANSONIA - MILFORD, GEOGRAPHIC AREA 5 AT DERBY, February 19, 2004, Decided , February 19, 2004, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Proceeds from tortfeasor was not unjust enrichment under workers' compensation act when paid to reimburse employer (through its insurers) for 100 percent of (1) benefits paid to employee, and (2) employer's expenses, with remainder to employee.
|
|
| |
City of Hartford v. Comm'n on Human Rights & Opportunities, CV030520745S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW BRITAIN AT NEW BRITAIN, February 19, 2004, Decided , February 19, 2004, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Employee was doing the work of an administrative clerk for 10 years; while she did that work, others in her working unit doing same work were hand-picked for promotion and attendant pay increases. Unlike them, she was a white, non-Hispanic female.
|
|
| |
|
| |
Horn v. Milford Subs, Inc., CV030081774S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF ANSONIA - MILFORD, AT MILFORD, February 19, 2004, Decided , February 19, 2004, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Where the Connecticut General Practice Book did not provide for or permit serial or consecutive requests and/or motions for extension of time to respond to interrogatories and requests for production, a mall's and a restaurant's requests were denied.
|
|
| |
Mownn v. Mownn, FA940317633S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF DANBURY, AT DANBURY, February 19, 2004, Decided , February 19, 2004, Filed
View this case - free
|
|
|
| |
State v. Mills, 132873,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, February 19, 2004, Decided , February 19, 2004, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Defendant's motion to preclude capital penalty hearing based on contention Connecticut's capital felony sentencing statute was unconstitutional was denied, as all of his grounds had already been rejected by the state and federal supreme courts.
|
|
| |
Williams v. Warden, State Prison, CV010807310,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TOLLAND, February 19, 2004, Decided , February 19, 2004, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Habeas relief based on ineffective assistance of trial counsel was denied where inmate did not suffer prejudice as result of misstatement by trial counsel, and error in regard to parole eligibility was not reason inmate rejected initial offer.
|
|
| |
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|
Worldwide
Feedback
Feedback