 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Triton Envtl., Inc. v. Dalton Enters., CV030482647S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, February 16, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because a plaintiff's Conn. Gen. Prac. Book, R. Super. Ct. § 10-50 special defenses had been heard and denied in a prior decision relating to the plaintiff's counterclaims, the defendant's Conn. Gen. Prac. Book, R. Super. Ct. § 10-42(a) motion to strike was granted.
|
|||||
| Viola v. O'Dell, CV054004823S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW BRITAIN AT NEW BRITAIN, February 16, 2007, Decided , February 16, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because substantial evidence supported the conclusion that a landscaping office was a prohibited use, and the fact that there was another possible conclusion suggested by the evidence did not negate a finding of substantial evidence, the court would have dismissed the zoning appeal. Thus, the alleged malpractice did not cause any damage.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
