 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| 1000 Silas Deane Highway v. Elite Bev., Inc., CVH6344; H-1213,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, HOUSING SESSION AT HARTFORD, February 15, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Lessee alleged sufficient facts to support counterclaim for interference with contractual relationship; lessee alleged that lessor misrepresented that a valid debt was owed, garnished accounts receivable, and improperly used a prejudgment remedy.
|
|||||
| Alisande H. Eng v. Sheehy, CV000370984,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, February 15, 2001, Decided , February 15, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The court denied an alleged DUI driver's motion to dismiss plaintiffs' counts for bystander emotional distress personal injury and for double and treble damages when he drove into and killed their sister in violation of several driving statutes.
|
|||||
| Ambro v. Daniels, CVCV980265098S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN AT MERIDEN, February 15, 2001, Decided , February 15, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's motion to open a default judgment was granted where it was conditioned on plaintiff's waiver of jurisdictional issues.
|
|||||
| B&S Sheetmetal Co. v. Castellani, CV000271042S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN AT MERIDEN, February 15, 2001, Decided , February 15, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where non-party selected plaintiff to provide materials and services for the construction of defendant's house, without any obligation on defendant to pay for them, defendant was granted summary judgment on plaintiff's unjust enrichment claim.
|
|||||
| Breither v. Appeal from Probate, CV000376207,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, February 15, 2001, Decided , February 15, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Estate beneficiaries' motion to strike reasons of appeal was denied as executor pled facts sufficient to negate the statutory presumption of pro-ration among the beneficiaries; pertinent statutory language did not have to be included.
|
|||||
| Campbell v. Administrator, CV000595308,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, February 15, 2001, Decided , February 15, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Refusing to do what an employee literally could not do did not make the employee insubordinate, did not constitute a refusal to perform a job function, and did not give the employer a reason for termination with cause.
|
|||||
| Enviro Express v. Resco, CV000374626,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, February 15, 2001, Decided , February 15, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Plaintiff's allegations that defendant unilaterally reduced its fee to plaintiff under a contract, after entering into the contract solely to resolve litigation, was sufficient to allege a claim under the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practice Act.
|
|||||
| Fahey v. Department of Social Servs., CV990498893S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW BRITAIN AT NEW BRITAIN, February 15, 2001, Decided , February 15, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Father was subject to lien on pending suit for reimbursement of welfare benefits paid to support his children because he failed to rebut presumption that amounts were necessary for proper care of children, and support orders were irrelevant.
|
|||||
| Frederick v. City of Bristol, CV000502804,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW BRITAIN AT NEW BRITAIN, February 15, 2001, Decided , February 15, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The court granted summary judgment for defendant city where it owed no common law or statutory duty to plaintiff to keep the sidewalk in a reasonably safe condition.
|
|||||
| In re Jonathan R., [NO NUMBER IN ORIGINAL],
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX, CHILD PROTECTION SESSION AT MIDDLETOWN, February 15, 2001, Decided , February 15, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Termination of parents' rights in their minor children was denied where there was a valuable ongoing parent-children relationship between them and termination would not serve the best interests of the children.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
