|
|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases —
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case —
for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
|
| |
State Courts -
Connecticut - March 28, 2002
|
| |
Belisle v. Belisle, FA000157092S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, AT WATERBURY, March 28, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: In a divorce case, certain personal items were to be returned; husband was awarded family home. Wife was to receive alimony, attorney's fees, and husband's retirement plan. Remainder of property was equitably distributed.
|
|
| |
Bramwell v. State, CV970481200S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW BRITAIN AT NEW BRITAIN, March 28, 2002, Decided , March 28, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: In claim of employment discrimination and retaliation, employee failed to show discrimination, hostile work environment, or retaliation.
|
|
| |
Cadle Co. v. Ginsburg, CV950076811S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF ANSONIA - MILFORD, AT MILFORD, March 28, 2002, Decided , March 28, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: LLC and IRS were not necessary parties because charging order merely gave creditor assignee rights in member/debtor's interest and was subject IRS's superior rights. Charging order did not affect management of LLC.
|
|
| |
Carasso v. Carasso, FA970715308,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, March 28, 2002, Decided , March 28, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Court found husband in contempt for unilaterally and willfully stopping alimony while he had capacity to pay, and then granted husband's motion to reduce alimony, but ordered him to provide wife with health and life insurance that he let lapse.
|
|
| |
Corrado v. S.K.M. Rests., CV970406540S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, March 28, 2002, Decided , March 28, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Nightspot patron who could not show that nightspot's employees created dangerous condition that caused his fall, or that owner had notice of the condition, could not recover for injuries.
|
|
| |
Festa v. Festa, FA000181115S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD-NORWALK, AT STAMFORD, March 28, 2002, Decided , March 28, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Visitation schedule was determined and procedure for division of property in entertainment room was devised.
|
|
| |
|
| |
Harmon v. Comm'r of Transp., CV990172408,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD-NORWALK, AT STAMFORD, March 28, 2002, Decided , March 28, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Damages recoverable for partial eminent domain taking were ordinarily difference between market value of whole tract before taking and after taking. Court accepted opinion of property owners' appraiser in assessing damages.
|
|
| |
Incor Group v. Polied Envtl. & Restoration Servs., CV010457219,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, March 28, 2002, Decided , March 28, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Contractor was denied prejudgment remedy in breach of contract action where superior court found there was no agreement between parties and contractor failed to establish probable cause that the contractor was entitled to recover damages.
|
|
| |
Johnson v. Warden, CV972420,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TOLLAND, AT ROCKVILLE, March 28, 2002, Decided , March 28, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Court denied prisoner's habeas corpus petition; statutes prevented double counting of pre-sentence confinement days in calculation of earned pre-sentence credit, and good time credit for offenses after October 1, 1994.
|
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|
Worldwide
Feedback
Feedback