 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Aposporos v. Urban Redevelopment Comm'n of Stamford, CV990175917S, CV990176039S, CV 99 0176039 S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD, February 20, 2003, Decided , February 20, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In an eminent domain action, where, upon appeal, the state supreme court held that the trial court erred in upholding the taking and remanded the proceedings, the property owners were entitled to recover attorneys fees for the original proceedings.
|
|||||
| Bell v. Burger, CV020514254S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW BRITAIN AT NEW BRITAIN, February 20, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where the judgment creditor filed a motion to strike the judgment debtor's special defenses on the ground of res judicata, the motion to strike could not be considered, because res judicata should have been raised in a motion for summary judgment.
|
|||||
| Chaves v. Arthur, CV020390889S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, February 20, 2003, Decided , February 20, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In an action by a contractor to recover for breach of contract and unjust enrichment, a homeowner was granted summary judgment because the contract did not meet statutory requirements for a home improvement contract.
|
|||||
| Christophe v. People's Bank, 385621,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, February 20, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In an action claiming workplace discrimination and retaliatory discharge following a workers' compensation claim, there was a genuine issue of fact as to whether the employee's alleged condition was sufficiently debilitating to warrant recovery.
|
|||||
| Eastland Title Servs. v. Lyle, CV990592374S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, February 20, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Fish v. Igoe, FA020193122S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD-NORWALK AT STAMFORD, February 20, 2003, Decided , February 20, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Fogg v. Estate of Gardella, CV000072030,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF ANSONIA-MILFORD, GEOGRAPHICAL AREA 5 AT DERBY, February 20, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Since the stepdaughter's claim was for specific property based upon oral promises and not a claim for money damages arising out of some personal debt or obligation on the part of the estate, it was exempt from statutory presentment requirements.
|
|||||
| Hnath v. Vecchitto, X03CV930502910,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW BRITAIN, COMPLEX LITIGATION DOCKET AT NEW BRITAIN, February 20, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In an accounting malpractice action, an accountant was not granted summary judgment based on statutes of limitations due to the unclear state of the law as to whether the continuous representation doctrine applied to toll the statutes.
|
|||||
| Holewa v. Sajda, CV970341101S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, February 20, 2003, Decided , February 20, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
